Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Veil-row legal adviser taken off case
The Daily Mail ^ | 13th November 2006

Posted on 11/13/2006 4:05:59 AM PST by Mrs Ivan

A legal adviser who refused an immigration tribunal judge's request to remove a full face veil has been pulled off the case which sparked the controversy.

Shabnam Mughal was taken off today's rescheduled appeal hearing and replaced by a senior partner at the Coventry-based law firm she works for.

Speaking outside the hearing centre in Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, solicitor Abdul Khan from The Law Partnership said the decision had been made in the best interest of the client and was not a reflection on Ms Mughal nor issues surrounding her use of a veil.

He told reporters: "It is not an issue of us backing down. We represent clients and our duty is to make sure that their interests are at the forefront of our mind.

"The decision was made solely in the interests of our client.

"This doesn't reflect in anyway on her (Ms Mughal) ability or on whether she can or cannot wear a veil in court."

Mr Khan, who appeared before the tribunal instead of Ms Mughal, said his colleague would continue to wear her veil during hearings.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: islam; veildebate; whingingmuslims
Somehow, I don't think we'll be "seeing" this cow back in court any time soon.
1 posted on 11/13/2006 4:06:01 AM PST by Mrs Ivan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

Somehow I get the feeling that the incident was more the idea of her Muslim senior partner, who may have wanted to win a precedent. I think she was ordered to wear the veil, to how how far the issue could be pushed


2 posted on 11/13/2006 4:09:22 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan
Mr Khan, who appeared before the tribunal instead of Ms Mughal, said his colleague would continue to wear her veil during hearings.

That's the point, if she (it?) is wearing a mask how can you tell who you are talking to? Any idiot could walk in off the street pretending to be anybody else.
3 posted on 11/13/2006 4:10:55 AM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

If she want to look like Zorro she should come to court with a sword and a horse.


4 posted on 11/13/2006 4:11:28 AM PST by sgtbono2002 (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

Is there widespread disgust with the muslims in your country or are we just seeing it that way due to the media. How hot is this issue to the common man?


5 posted on 11/13/2006 4:18:14 AM PST by umgud (I love NASCAR as much as the Democrats hate Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

For the most part I think mooselimb females should wear face masks, damn near all of then look like yassar arafat does now. And he's been dead for a year.


6 posted on 11/13/2006 4:18:41 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan

She wasnt acting in the best interests of her money paying clients by provoking the judge was she?


7 posted on 11/13/2006 4:24:27 AM PST by oilfieldtrash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

'Is there widespread disgust with the muslims in your country or are we just seeing it that way due to the media. How hot is this issue to the common man?'

I can't speak for Mrs Ivan, but I find that the muslim issue is currently a big one here in England. The concensus seems to be that most brits are proud to have a country that is open and accepting of others, but only up to a point and that point has now been crossed. The man in the street is happy to accept immigrants who integrate - we never have a moments bother with Hindus, Sikhs, Chinese, Polish etc, etc, just with muslims. Those who don't integrate have chosen to live in the wrong country and though we may be slow to anger, when roused we will defend our beliefs and rights until the end as we have done for millenia. The 1.7m muslims in the UK would do well not to face the wrath of the 92.1% of the UK that is white anglo saxon celt christian if they wish to live here in peace.


8 posted on 11/13/2006 4:35:21 AM PST by AngloSaxonChristian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AngloSaxonChristian

Thanks

It sound like it is coming to a boil over there. Good luck.


9 posted on 11/13/2006 4:44:35 AM PST by umgud (I love NASCAR as much as the Democrats hate Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AngloSaxonChristian

Thanks

It sounds like it is coming to a boil over there. Good luck.


10 posted on 11/13/2006 4:44:51 AM PST by umgud (I love NASCAR as much as the Democrats hate Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson