Replies

"Isn't Rudy pro choice, pro-gay marriage and pro gun control? I've seen a number of liberal blogs rave about Rudy's liberal tendencies".....

Rudy might be those things, but so is HILLARY! I think Rudy is the only person who can beat her. He will draw the Independents, the Moderate Democrats AND the Men's votes. If it comes down to Hillary vs Guiliani...guess who I'm going to vote for!! Look what happened to Allen, he's as Conservative as they come and he couldn't even win back his Senate Seat. If he had been running against Hillary for President it wouldn't even have been a contest! She would have beaten him like a Drum.

Hillary, Rudy...run to tyranny or walk to it.

Rudy might be those things, but so is HILLARY! I think Rudy is the only person who can beat her.

Well, whoop de do! So what?

Pick a Liebral.

Gimme a break. The pubbies got decimated in the last election for their leftward shift.

The liberals would go nuts trying to figure out which liberal to vote for, but they base would be completely disenfranchised.

To give Rudy credit, what he did in New York worked for New York. Not many mountain lions wandering around New York City. More people live in one building there than in my whole county. This isn't New York, folks. There is an awful lot of flyover country between the East Coast and the Left coast, and we are not buying in on New York solutions to problems we don't even have.

So, ENOUGH! I am not going to contribute one dime to a liberal Republican candidate for president. Not a red cent. As for voting, I am not voting to support stripping me of my firearms. (That would be pretty dumb, ya think?)

I am not voting to murder babies in the womb, partially or otherwise.

As an American and as a Christian, I cannot give tacit approval to either.

I voted the party ticket last time, but if the Republican party insists on being stuck on stupid, I, and a lot more like me won't be voting Republican.

Americans tend to elect the presidential candidate who is more optimistic and likable. Let's make that distinction as sharp as possible by choosing very carefully our candidate for the election of 2008.

The best Republican candidate is the one who best fits the model of Ronald Reagan not merely in substance but in temperament. Hillary wouldn't have a prayer against such a candidate. Her personality is drab, dry, hectoring, preachy, humorless, and abrasive.

Put someone up against her who is sunny, cheerful, optimistic, articulate, and engaging and she will come off like the wicked witch of east by comparison. She will lose.

Americans tend to elect the presidential candidate who is more optimistic and likable. Let's make that distinction as sharp as possible by choosing very carefully our candidate for the election of 2008.

The best Republican candidate is the one who best fits the model of Ronald Reagan not merely in substance but in temperament. Hillary wouldn't have a prayer against such a candidate. Her personality is drab, dry, hectoring, preachy, humorless, and abrasive.

Put someone up against her who is sunny, cheerful, optimistic, articulate, and engaging and she will come off like the wicked witch of the east by comparison. She will lose.