Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/12/2006 6:06:36 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: NYer
I'd just like to say that the right to life for the Church of England is not absolute, either.

In fact, it's already dead.

It's just that nobody has yet had the honesty and courage to give it a decent burial.

54 posted on 11/12/2006 9:04:38 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

The "protest" never ends!


55 posted on 11/12/2006 9:05:36 AM PST by G Larry (Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

56 posted on 11/12/2006 9:07:08 AM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Church of England? Apparently that was the church Herod attended.


57 posted on 11/12/2006 9:08:44 AM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world now than Naziism was in 1937.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

There is a difference between euthanasia and not using extraordinary measures to keep an infant alive. As a pediatric nurse, I have taken care of many children who are kept alive only through extensive, invasive treatment. Most of those children will never even be capable of forming thoughts. The vast majority of us would not want to be kept alive if we were in a situation where there was no hope of ever being conscious and thinking. Why should be always assume that it is right to do keep an infant alive in these circumstances?


59 posted on 11/12/2006 9:26:13 AM PST by sunvalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
I believe that, in British law, the Queen is the head of the Church of England. However, it has been traditional for hundreds of years that the monarch doesn't meddle in Church matters.
There now seems sufficient grounds for her to step in and clean house for a Church that has completely lost it's way. If, as a result, the Church is split between believers and abortionists, she will have only hastened it's end.
63 posted on 11/12/2006 10:01:47 AM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
From the first Christian church to approve artificially induced sterility, or "birth control."
Few realize that up until 1930, all Protestant denominations agreed with the Catholic Church’s teaching condemning contraception as sinful. At its 1930 Lambeth Conference, the Anglican church, swayed by growing social pressure, announced that contraception would be allowed in some circumstances.

73 posted on 11/12/2006 11:55:32 AM PST by Aquinasfan (When you find "Sola Scriptura" in the Bible, let me know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...


75 posted on 11/12/2006 12:47:09 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Its views were expressed in a similar submission to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics, which was set up two years ago and which is due to publish its finding later this week.

*************

Why is it that any issue subjected to the scrutiny of those in "bioethics" results in a death sentence for some poor unfortunate?

76 posted on 11/12/2006 1:04:23 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Always interesting to see possible and certainly in the same sentance. Demonic death cult.


77 posted on 11/12/2006 1:06:58 PM PST by Binstence (Live freep or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

<< (Tiny Blair and the other, some even posing as bishops, priests and as other clergy, fascissocialist heirs and successors of those who once saw to the sanctity of what used to be) The (Holy, Catholic and Apostolic) Church of England believe doctors should be given the right to withhold treatment from some seriously disabled newborn babies .... >>

Post-Christian, once great, now groveling, britain, in which Brussels, Strasbourg and Sharia trump even common sense and basic decency -- and not to even mention, God's Law -- is doomed.

Dissolute, decadent, degenerate, dead -- doomed!


82 posted on 11/12/2006 10:06:36 PM PST by Brian Allen ("Moral issues are always terribly complex, for someone without principles." - G K Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

"wrong color eyes...Doctor, kill it."


84 posted on 11/12/2006 11:12:42 PM PST by gilor (Pull the wool over your own eyes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nightshift; 8mmMauser

ping...


85 posted on 11/13/2006 6:08:46 AM PST by tutstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
More words of wisdom from the formerly Christian Church of England.

Sigh!

86 posted on 11/13/2006 6:10:03 AM PST by markomalley (Vivat Iesus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer; tutstar
Pinged from Terri NOVEMBER Dailies

8mm


92 posted on 11/14/2006 4:44:28 AM PST by 8mmMauser ("We will not be silent. We are your bad conscience. The White Rose will give you no rest.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson