To: laconic
I remembered when Bush first announced the Iraq war. My gut reaction was "you bastard".
However, being a patriot, I felt once we were there it was impariative to defend the cause & the war.
Too bad GW didn't feel compelled to champion & defend the war except right before election time. He allowed the media to define the war, then he allowed the media to define the GOP. We didn't hear a word from him until crunch time. (By then the damage was done)
I am angry, bitter and disheartened by Bushs lack of leadership. I can't even stomach seeing the man on TV.
Laughing and joking with Nancy Pelosi.
104 posted on
11/11/2006 9:46:11 AM PST by
Nav_Mom
To: ohioWfan
106 posted on
11/11/2006 9:54:26 AM PST by
1035rep
To: Nav_Mom; 1035rep; snugs
I call troll here. Anyone else agree??
New sign on date, absurd beyond comprehension posts, hatred for a good and decent man who has led us with courage in a war against an evil enemy, and has stood firmly for the sanctity of human life and given us two strong Constitutionalist justices as well as countless conservative judges.
We may never see as conservative a President again, folks.
But I'm pretty sure that's the GOAL of Nav_Mom.
114 posted on
11/11/2006 10:34:06 AM PST by
ohioWfan
(If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
To: Nav_Mom
The deal will go soemthing like this: the Dem leadership in Congress might go easier on the subpoenas if Bush nominates judges more like Souter and Stevens. I suspect that this is exactly what will happen.
131 posted on
11/11/2006 10:50:14 AM PST by
laconic
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson