Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: L.A.Justice

They lost because the heavy Republican districts in Southern Cal. didn't vote in the same percentages as 2000 and 2004. 5 - 10 % less. W.T.H.


344 posted on 11/11/2006 10:36:49 AM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]


To: muleskinner
They lost because the heavy Republican districts in Southern Cal. didn't vote in the same percentages as 2000 and 2004. 5 - 10 % less. W.T.H.

2000 and 2004 were Presidential elections. 2006 was a midterm. Turnout was pert near average for a midterm election, down about 3.5% from 2002. See the numbers for yourself here. Keep in mind the following: turnout doesn't always include absentee ballots. Don't rely on what the California MSM tells you. Earlier in the thread, I pointed out where the SF Chronic blatantly lied about turnout.

356 posted on 11/11/2006 4:15:20 PM PST by LexBaird (98% satisfaction guaranteed. There's just no pleasing some people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson