Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Election Analysis
The Conservative Caucus ^ | November 9, 2006 | Howard Phillips

Posted on 11/10/2006 8:01:51 PM PST by Jeremydmccann

Howard Phillips, Chairman of The Conservative Caucus, a non-partisan public policy action organization founded in 1974, issued the following statement concerning the nationwide defeat of Republican candidates for the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives:

"The November 7 election results are, to a significant degree, attributable to the policies of the Bush Administration in many areas, in addition to Iraq. These include:

advocacy of amnesty for illegal aliens,

failure to enforce existing immigration laws which require penalization of corporations which hire illegal aliens,

promotion of a North American Union (NAU) scheme to merge the United States with Canada and Mexico,

historically high subsidies to Planned Parenthood,

appointment of open homosexuals to key positions,

massive expansion of the Federal role in education,

increased funding of the United Nations,

expansion of foreign aid,

failure to move forward deployment effectively of a ballistic missile defense,

budget busting expansion of non-defense Federal spending and massive increases in annual deficits and the overall national debt,

trade policies which have undermined America’s manufacturing base and placed millions of American jobs at risk,

approval of anti-family FDA policies such as authority for the distribution of RU-486 and over-the-counter sales of "morning after" contraceptives,

approval of threats to U.S. civil liberties, including elements of the Patriot Act,

signing into law the McCain-Feingold election regulation bill in clear violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution.

"The tragedy is that the Republican Congressional leadership in the House and Senate, by and large, rubber stamped unconstitutional Bush Administration policies, instead of fulfilling responsibilities of oversight and independent judgment as intended by the framers of the U.S. Constitution which made the Legislative Branch of our government primary in our Federal system.

"One can only hope that, during a time of partisan gridlock, Republicans in Congress will manifest a degree of independence from unwise Bush Administration policies and that the President himself will stand against unwise policies of the new Democrat Party majorities in Congress.

"Tragically, during the campaign season just ended, in most parts of the country, conservative voters, in order to manifest their unhappiness, were put in a position of either (a) holding their nose and voting for Republicans with whom they disagreed, (b) staying away from the polls, or (c) voting for imperfect Democratic candidates.

"Fortunately, in some instances, the Democrats put forward candidates who were more conservative than their Republican adversaries and a handful of these candidates were successful on election day.

"My hope is that, as we draw closer to the 2008 Presidential and Congressional elections, Constitutionally faithful candidates not tied to the Bush Administration will receive significant media attention and popular support."


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: conservatives; election; liberals; neocons; republicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

1 posted on 11/10/2006 8:01:52 PM PST by Jeremydmccann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann

Damn dude. I'll read later.


2 posted on 11/10/2006 8:04:23 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann

It's all Michael Savage's fault. There, you have your scapegoat.


3 posted on 11/10/2006 8:04:31 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann
in some instances, the Democrats put forward candidates who were more conservative than their Republican adversaries

Bingo

4 posted on 11/10/2006 8:04:46 PM PST by apackof2 (They don't care how much you know until they know how much you care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann

Bush didn't meet a bill that wasn't worthy of being signed.

"COME ONE COME ALL," he seemed to say.

Signing everything didn't make him seem more compassionate. And it didn't help with the Democrats.


5 posted on 11/10/2006 8:05:38 PM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann
Were the Dems right after all? Was Bush wrong, wrong, wrong.

When I did something wrong, I'd blame my sister. My mother never bought it, and neither should we. Let's blame Bush, let's follow Newt, let's go over the cliff.

6 posted on 11/10/2006 8:07:08 PM PST by PatrickF4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann
"Tragically, during the campaign season just ended, in most parts of the country, conservative voters, in order to manifest their unhappiness, were put in a position of either (a) holding their nose and voting for Republicans with whom they disagreed, (b) staying away from the polls, or (c) voting for imperfect Democratic candidates.

Exactly. I want someone I can support, not just because he's somewhat better than the other guy. He/she doesn't have to be 100% on everything, but I know we can do better than we've done. susie

7 posted on 11/10/2006 8:09:38 PM PST by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Signing everything didn't make him seem more compassionate. And it didn't help with the Democrats.
He pandered and pandered and pandered to 'em.
And they slandered and slandered and slandered him.
And his reaction to all that slander is --- you guessed it ---
To pander to them some more.
8 posted on 11/10/2006 8:10:26 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann
"promotion of a North American Union (NAU) scheme to merge the United States with Canada and Mexico,"

I call BS on that one. Even if it's in fact true, this is still mostly rumors and the average voter likely knows little or nothing about the issue.

9 posted on 11/10/2006 8:10:52 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apackof2

Tragically, they did not put forth candidates that WERE more conservative. They only sounded that way. Here in Tennessee, we saw through Harold Ford's mask enough to win against him. But if he had not had his record and family history hanging around his neck, I believe he would have won easily.


10 posted on 11/10/2006 8:12:15 PM PST by Ingtar (Prensa dos para el ingles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

I think that your assessment is a bit harsh.


11 posted on 11/10/2006 8:12:30 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
"Signing everything didn't make him seem more compassionate."

Bush could redeem himself with me if he would just sit in the oval office and veto every single thing coming out of congress over the next two years, and I mean everything!

12 posted on 11/10/2006 8:15:11 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Are you saying they didn't slander him?


13 posted on 11/10/2006 8:18:49 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann
Fortunately, in some instances, the Democrats put forward candidates who were more conservative than their Republican adversaries...

Sad, but true. It is a sad day when conservative voters have to vote for a Dem because he is more conservative than the RINO he is running against.

14 posted on 11/10/2006 8:19:10 PM PST by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeremydmccann
Fortunately, in some instances, the Democrats put forward candidates who were more conservative than their Republican adversaries and a handful of these candidates were successful on election day.

Meaning it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between the two parties because those who are registered as Republicans are leaning more to the left by becoming more Socialistic.

"My hope is that, as we draw closer to the 2008 Presidential and Congressional elections, Constitutionally faithful candidates not tied to the Bush Administration will receive significant media attention and popular support."

Proof enough it's time for a third party, that won't sacrifice its core principles through "bipartisanship", to replace one of the existing parties.

15 posted on 11/10/2006 8:20:12 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
Are you saying they didn't slander him?

No, if you read post 2 you might know that.
16 posted on 11/10/2006 8:21:20 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: KoRn
Bush could redeem himself with me if he would just sit in the oval office and veto every single thing coming out of congress over the next two years, and I mean everything!
Ok, KoRn, time to exhale. You're going to have a coughing fit if you hold it in that long.

If he vetoed ONE spending bill in the next two years, that would be a major event of historic proportions in the Bush Administration. Just one. I like to see just one.

(See. I called you a dreamer, but you're not the only one. I hope someday Bush will join us, and his Vetos count to ONE.)

17 posted on 11/10/2006 8:24:20 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Post 2 doesn't say anything except you plan to read the article later. So I'm supposed to know what you're thinking from that? Sorry, without knowing your IP address I can't possibly read your mind. I'm on Windows, not Linux.


18 posted on 11/10/2006 8:26:04 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

Post #13.


19 posted on 11/10/2006 8:27:14 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

You're losing it, kinoxi. Post #13 was my question to you. Is this your version of the old joke about prisoners knowing jokes so well they only had to call out the numbers and all the other prisoners would laugh?


20 posted on 11/10/2006 8:30:17 PM PST by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
RLC Liberty Caucus
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson