Alright, to be reasonable though, you have to see that the article to this thread is basically drivel.
The second paragragh is fallacious, and the author's spin on Savage's opinion is based on his disdain for the guy.
I heard Mike endorse republicans, and his analysis after the results came in was basically right; as opposed to what this 'article' states.
Just another (bad) excuse to bash Savage. (some can't get enough)
LOL
I know you are a weiner-lover too, so why should I even bother to respond?
Did you get a load of how irate Savage-Weiner was at the fact that sensible Republicans refused to appear on his childish show? Think maybe he wants some revenge for that? If you continue to defend Savage-Weiner, you are only proving that you are emotionally immature too. Have at it.