Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tennmountainman
Of course they justified Bush's support of lieberman because the GOP Candidate had no chance of winning.

I cannot have a reasonable discourse that is based on a flat out lie. Bush did not support him.
47 posted on 11/10/2006 3:19:38 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: kinoxi
Bush did not support him.

Pres. Bush's refused to endorse the GOP candidate in Connecticut. His silence was a tacit endorsement for Lieberman. Between that and the Pres. and VP going around praising Lieberman's WOT record didn't help the GOP in Connecticut at all.

And don't try to claim that Lieberman didn't get a lot of high-level GOP support.

"Lieberman has raised $15.6 million, drawing substantial support from out-of-state sources — particularly from financial service executives in New York City and lobbyists. Lieberman has continued to raise funds in the waning days of the campaign, including a $12,100 contribution from New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, a Republican, and $5,000 from former Sen. Alfonse D'Amato, R-N.Y." From Senate race: Shrill, nasty, expensive

52 posted on 11/10/2006 3:44:04 PM PST by Tamar1973 (I find your lack of faith disturbing--Darth Vader, Ep. IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson