Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. If the President thinks he can get along with the Dems in D.C. he does not understand how the Dems operate. I hope after 6 years he finally understands that Reagan was the only Republican who defeated these guys in a big way and never did it by trying to get along with them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
To: truthandlife
Joe said all along that he would caucus with the Democrats. That's probably a reason he won. If he did anything else, he would be untrustworthy.
2 posted on
11/10/2006 10:42:46 AM PST by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: truthandlife
Why is anyone surprised?
I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway.
3 posted on
11/10/2006 10:44:20 AM PST by
Zionist Conspirator
(Vayo'mer HaShem, za`aqat Sedom va`Amorah ki rabbah; vechatta'tam, ki khavedah me'od.)
To: truthandlife
Republican sages, in the not-too-distant past, strongly urged, even demanded, that the Neanderthal conservatives 'wise up and support Joe!'
5 posted on
11/10/2006 10:49:06 AM PST by
jla
To: truthandlife
As if we would have confused him with a Republican.
6 posted on
11/10/2006 10:49:37 AM PST by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: truthandlife
7 posted on
11/10/2006 10:49:40 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. How does it show that?
8 posted on
11/10/2006 10:50:09 AM PST by
1rudeboy
To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat.I may not agree with Sen. Lieberman but you cannot say he is untrustworthy. He has always said if he was elected as an independent he would caucus with the Democratic party. He has never said he would not do this.
In a sense, Lieberman is now the most powerful Senator. He owes absolutely nothing to the Democratic Party now. He can demand any chairmanship with either party if he wanted to. Without his caucus vote, the Democrats would not have a majority and would be forced to share power with Republicans.
9 posted on
11/10/2006 10:50:20 AM PST by
pnh102
To: truthandlife
Good point!
Lieberman will never learn. I felt badly how he was treated; now I don't.
11 posted on
11/10/2006 10:51:49 AM PST by
cvq3842
To: truthandlife
The wife in denial who stays with the abusive husband no matter what.
14 posted on
11/10/2006 10:54:09 AM PST by
Argus
(Silver Lining in the Democrat Takeover Top Ten List #6: The gay weddings will be fabulous.)
To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. - not true; campaigns are one thing, working with the other side is quite another; politics is NOT nice business, the President knows this.
To: truthandlife
17 posted on
11/10/2006 10:56:57 AM PST by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: truthandlife
Anybody who expeced Joe to be a republican was just fooling themselves.
Joe has sense and can be trusted more than any other dem on the WoT, but other issues he has always promised to be the liberal that he is.
To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.
21 posted on
11/10/2006 11:00:12 AM PST by
nutmeg
(In 2008 we will crush the Democrats like the cockroaches they are! -- Mark Levin 11-8-06)
To: truthandlife
Heck, Joe's just being what he always has been. He didn't pretend to be otherwise, and he's sure better than Lamont.
To: truthandlife
It probably would have better if Lamont would have won, it would have put MORE pressure on the dems to pull out NOW.(Whats the difference anyhow)
To: truthandlife
Supporting Lieberman helped keep Lamont out of office. But Joe was never one of us.
In hindsight, we may have been better off with Lamont.
26 posted on
11/10/2006 11:03:19 AM PST by
Corin Stormhands
(Attention 2008 Candidates: This tagline for rent.)
To: truthandlife
Did you people seriously think he was going to switch parties and become a conservative? The only benefit we got from Lieberman's election was watching ned lament spend a pile of his own dough.
To: truthandlife
With the Democratic takeover of the Senate, Lieberman is in line to become chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Actually that is good news for the company I work for. About time you brought home some bacon Joe!
31 posted on
11/10/2006 11:07:21 AM PST by
McGruff
To: truthandlife
I'm beginning to wonder about Glenn Beck as far as that goes. He was the one out there telling everyone to vote for the person and go for those supposed "blue dog" demonrats. I think he has set a place for himself at the golden trough of the pigs who feed from the scraps of the world elite. I hope all of those who stayed home or voted in the demons choke on the dust of our ruin!
33 posted on
11/10/2006 11:08:28 AM PST by
Camel Joe
(liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
To: truthandlife
I hope after 6 years he finally understands that Reagan was the only Republican who defeated these guys in a big way What a crock .. Reagan never defeated Democrats in any way. He got Democrats to support the economic and foreign policies of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. He had Tip O'Neil, the Democrat speaker of the house, over the white house many times. Reagan never invited Conservative Barry Goldwater anywhere.
Reagan governed using the Democratic economic policy of cut taxes and deficit spending. The deficit doubled under Reagan as did federal spending. The number of civilian government workers under Reagan grew by over 200,000 people. He only managed to close just one tiny government agency. The Reagan foreign policy was the Kennedy policy of defend any friend and oppose any foe of liberty. .. Right out of the JFK inaugural address.
Reagan got along very well with Democrats. Why should they dislike him he governed as liberal as JFK.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson