Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. If the President thinks he can get along with the Dems in D.C. he does not understand how the Dems operate. I hope after 6 years he finally understands that Reagan was the only Republican who defeated these guys in a big way and never did it by trying to get along with them.
1 posted on 11/10/2006 10:41:27 AM PST by truthandlife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
To: truthandlife

Joe said all along that he would caucus with the Democrats. That's probably a reason he won. If he did anything else, he would be untrustworthy.


2 posted on 11/10/2006 10:42:46 AM PST by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Why is anyone surprised?

I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway.

3 posted on 11/10/2006 10:44:20 AM PST by Zionist Conspirator (Vayo'mer HaShem, za`aqat Sedom va`Amorah ki rabbah; vechatta'tam, ki khavedah me'od.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Republican sages, in the not-too-distant past, strongly urged, even demanded, that the Neanderthal conservatives 'wise up and support Joe!'
5 posted on 11/10/2006 10:49:06 AM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

As if we would have confused him with a Republican.


6 posted on 11/10/2006 10:49:37 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

No real surprise there.


7 posted on 11/10/2006 10:49:40 AM PST by cripplecreek (If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat.

How does it show that?

8 posted on 11/10/2006 10:50:09 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat.

I may not agree with Sen. Lieberman but you cannot say he is untrustworthy. He has always said if he was elected as an independent he would caucus with the Democratic party. He has never said he would not do this.

In a sense, Lieberman is now the most powerful Senator. He owes absolutely nothing to the Democratic Party now. He can demand any chairmanship with either party if he wanted to. Without his caucus vote, the Democrats would not have a majority and would be forced to share power with Republicans.

9 posted on 11/10/2006 10:50:20 AM PST by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

Good point!

Lieberman will never learn. I felt badly how he was treated; now I don't.


11 posted on 11/10/2006 10:51:49 AM PST by cvq3842
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

The wife in denial who stays with the abusive husband no matter what.


14 posted on 11/10/2006 10:54:09 AM PST by Argus (Silver Lining in the Democrat Takeover Top Ten List #6: The gay weddings will be fabulous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. - not true; campaigns are one thing, working with the other side is quite another; politics is NOT nice business, the President knows this.


15 posted on 11/10/2006 10:55:50 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
An idea of how sick this debacle makes me.

Regards, Ivan

17 posted on 11/10/2006 10:56:57 AM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

Anybody who expeced Joe to be a republican was just fooling themselves.

Joe has sense and can be trusted more than any other dem on the WoT, but other issues he has always promised to be the liberal that he is.


19 posted on 11/10/2006 10:57:13 AM PST by FreedomNeocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

21 posted on 11/10/2006 11:00:12 AM PST by nutmeg (In 2008 we will crush the Democrats like the cockroaches they are! -- Mark Levin 11-8-06)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

Heck, Joe's just being what he always has been. He didn't pretend to be otherwise, and he's sure better than Lamont.


23 posted on 11/10/2006 11:01:42 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

It probably would have better if Lamont would have won, it would have put MORE pressure on the dems to pull out NOW.(Whats the difference anyhow)


24 posted on 11/10/2006 11:01:54 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

Supporting Lieberman helped keep Lamont out of office. But Joe was never one of us.

In hindsight, we may have been better off with Lamont.


26 posted on 11/10/2006 11:03:19 AM PST by Corin Stormhands (Attention 2008 Candidates: This tagline for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife

Did you people seriously think he was going to switch parties and become a conservative? The only benefit we got from Lieberman's election was watching ned lament spend a pile of his own dough.


27 posted on 11/10/2006 11:04:36 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
With the Democratic takeover of the Senate, Lieberman is in line to become chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee.

Actually that is good news for the company I work for. About time you brought home some bacon Joe!

31 posted on 11/10/2006 11:07:21 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
I'm beginning to wonder about Glenn Beck as far as that goes. He was the one out there telling everyone to vote for the person and go for those supposed "blue dog" demonrats. I think he has set a place for himself at the golden trough of the pigs who feed from the scraps of the world elite. I hope all of those who stayed home or voted in the demons choke on the dust of our ruin!
33 posted on 11/10/2006 11:08:28 AM PST by Camel Joe (liberal=socialist=royalist/imperialist pawn=enemy of Freedom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truthandlife
I hope after 6 years he finally understands that Reagan was the only Republican who defeated these guys in a big way

What a crock .. Reagan never defeated Democrats in any way. He got Democrats to support the economic and foreign policies of John Fitzgerald Kennedy. He had Tip O'Neil, the Democrat speaker of the house, over the white house many times. Reagan never invited Conservative Barry Goldwater anywhere.

Reagan governed using the Democratic economic policy of cut taxes and deficit spending. The deficit doubled under Reagan as did federal spending. The number of civilian government workers under Reagan grew by over 200,000 people. He only managed to close just one tiny government agency. The Reagan foreign policy was the Kennedy policy of defend any friend and oppose any foe of liberty. .. Right out of the JFK inaugural address.

Reagan got along very well with Democrats. Why should they dislike him he governed as liberal as JFK.

34 posted on 11/10/2006 11:09:34 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson