Skip to comments.
Lieberman: Call Me a Democrat (Barf Alert)
Newsmax ^
| 11-11-06
| Newsmax Staff
Posted on 11/10/2006 10:41:25 AM PST by truthandlife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. If the President thinks he can get along with the Dems in D.C. he does not understand how the Dems operate. I hope after 6 years he finally understands that Reagan was the only Republican who defeated these guys in a big way and never did it by trying to get along with them.
To: truthandlife
Joe said all along that he would caucus with the Democrats. That's probably a reason he won. If he did anything else, he would be untrustworthy.
2
posted on
11/10/2006 10:42:46 AM PST
by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: truthandlife
Why is anyone surprised?
I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway.
3
posted on
11/10/2006 10:44:20 AM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Vayo'mer HaShem, za`aqat Sedom va`Amorah ki rabbah; vechatta'tam, ki khavedah me'od.)
To: Zionist Conspirator
I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway. I didn't either. People were acting as if he were another Zell Miller.
4
posted on
11/10/2006 10:47:14 AM PST
by
TUAN_JIM
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: truthandlife
Republican sages, in the not-too-distant past, strongly urged, even demanded, that the Neanderthal conservatives 'wise up and support Joe!'
5
posted on
11/10/2006 10:49:06 AM PST
by
jla
To: truthandlife
As if we would have confused him with a Republican.
6
posted on
11/10/2006 10:49:37 AM PST
by
theDentist
(Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
To: truthandlife
7
posted on
11/10/2006 10:49:40 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?)
To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. How does it show that?
8
posted on
11/10/2006 10:50:09 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat.I may not agree with Sen. Lieberman but you cannot say he is untrustworthy. He has always said if he was elected as an independent he would caucus with the Democratic party. He has never said he would not do this.
In a sense, Lieberman is now the most powerful Senator. He owes absolutely nothing to the Democratic Party now. He can demand any chairmanship with either party if he wanted to. Without his caucus vote, the Democrats would not have a majority and would be forced to share power with Republicans.
9
posted on
11/10/2006 10:50:20 AM PST
by
pnh102
To: Zionist Conspirator
he is a strong supporter of the war on terrorism. we should be fortunate we can get even that out of connecticut.
To: truthandlife
Good point!
Lieberman will never learn. I felt badly how he was treated; now I don't.
11
posted on
11/10/2006 10:51:49 AM PST
by
cvq3842
To: philsfan24
he is a strong supporter of the war on terrorism. we should be fortunate we can get even that out of connecticut.We'll see.
I don't trust any liberal or any Democrat.
12
posted on
11/10/2006 10:52:50 AM PST
by
Zionist Conspirator
(Vayo'mer HaShem, za`aqat Sedom va`Amorah ki rabbah; vechatta'tam, ki khavedah me'od.)
To: Zionist Conspirator
I never understood all the enthusiasm for Lieberman by conservatives/Republicans in this Senate race anyway. Why?! What's so hard to understand that Lieberman is 5X better than his opponent, Demented?
To: truthandlife
The wife in denial who stays with the abusive husband no matter what.
14
posted on
11/10/2006 10:54:09 AM PST
by
Argus
(Silver Lining in the Democrat Takeover Top Ten List #6: The gay weddings will be fabulous.)
To: truthandlife
Just shows, you can't trust a Democrat. - not true; campaigns are one thing, working with the other side is quite another; politics is NOT nice business, the President knows this.
To: jla; #1CTYankee
Republican sages, in the not-too-distant past, strongly urged, even demanded, that the Neanderthal conservatives 'wise up and support Joe!'If we didn't, the Senate would have included George Soros' / moveon.org's pet anti-war, anti-Bush moonbat Ned Lamont, who roared into Connecticut like a hurricane. Lieberman was clearly the lesser of the two evils. He's a liberal for sure, but definitely "gets it" regarding the WOT. The Connecticut GOP candidate was not even remotely viable. Our choice was between Lieberman and Lamont.
I never thought for one day Joe would become a Republican after he won the election, btw. I knew he would remain a democRAT.
16
posted on
11/10/2006 10:56:04 AM PST
by
nutmeg
(In 2008 we will crush the Democrats like the cockroaches they are! -- Mark Levin 11-8-06)
To: truthandlife
17
posted on
11/10/2006 10:56:57 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: Zionist Conspirator; All
In early January, when this hoopla about Lamont will have died down and party activists are thinking about other things, Joe Lieberman will contribute a
very large sum of money to a Democratic campaign organization to make amends for his failure to help Democrat House candidates.
Say a little bird told me.
After that, as far as anything official goes, Lieberman will be a full member of the Democrat establishment. Joe Lieberman is as much a Democrat as Pat Leahy. What's unbelievably ironic about all this is that the money that Lieberman turns over is almost exclusively from the $6-$8 million in GOP contributors that Rove steered towards him. So you'll effectively have Bush Pioneer types funding the Democrat party. BRILLIANT STRATEGY GUYS -- so glad that money went to a stalwart conservative like Loserman rather than to, I DON'T KNOW ---- George Allen.
18
posted on
11/10/2006 10:56:58 AM PST
by
Alter Kaker
("Whatever tears one sheds, in the end one always blows one's nose." - Heine)
To: truthandlife
Anybody who expeced Joe to be a republican was just fooling themselves.
Joe has sense and can be trusted more than any other dem on the WoT, but other issues he has always promised to be the liberal that he is.
To: AmericaUnited
What's so hard to understand that Lieberman is 5X better than his opponent, Demented?Thank you... you are correct. Joe is probably at least 10X better than Red Ned Lamont, who was supported by George Soros, Moveon.org, Code Pink, Daily Kos, DU, Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Cindy Sheehan...
20
posted on
11/10/2006 10:59:39 AM PST
by
nutmeg
(In 2008 we will crush the Democrats like the cockroaches they are! -- Mark Levin 11-8-06)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson