Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mwl1
I'm not sure. Firing Rumsfeld last year - maybe. But Aug. or Sep. would have been seen as an admission the Dems were right, or as a panic move. what he SHOULDN'T have done was fire him within two weeks of saying he wanted him on for the long haul. Ran up the white flag [although he'd already done that when he put James "Metternich" Baker, the 'pragmatist" weenie of Bush 41 fame in charge of his Iraq recommendation committee].
185 posted on 11/10/2006 8:04:01 AM PST by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: PzLdr

Why do you care what the Democrats would have thought of a Rumsfield resignation in August or September?

Do you think that they really were planning to vote Republican and that the resignation would jeopardize that?

You have to motivate those who actually might vote your way, not those who never will.

And having Rumsfield resign 5-6 months ago would have motivated those more concerned with the WOT.


345 posted on 11/10/2006 10:52:28 AM PST by gogogodzilla (I criticize everyone... and then breathe some radioactive fire and stomp on things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson