Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich says Bush, GOP to blame for defeat
Atlanta Journal Constitution ^ | 11/09/06 | TOM BAXTER

Posted on 11/10/2006 6:59:08 AM PST by Pokey78

After having watched the majority he engineered in 1994 crumble in this week's elections, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich laid into President Bush and congressional Republicans in an Atlanta appearance Thursday.

Taking questions after a medical forum, the former GOP congressman from Cobb County said four c's — an absence of competence in Republican performance, an absence of candor, corruption and the bad advice of consultants — led to Tuesday's defeat.

But Gingrich saved his strongest words for President Bush's performance at the Wednesday press conference announcing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld's resignation. Bush told reporters that he had planned to replace Rumsfeld since before the election, despite praising the unpopular defense secretary a week ago and saying he would remain for the duration of his presidency.

"If the president had decided to replace Secretary Rumsfeld he should have told us two weeks ago," Gingrich said. "I think that we would today control the Senate and probably have 10 to15 more House seats. And I found it very disturbing yesterday in the press conference, the explanation that the President gave.

"We need candor, we need directness," said Gingrich, a potential 2008 presidential candidate."We need to understand the threats we faced with are so frightening and so real, the danger that we'll lose two to three American cities so great, that we cannot play games with each other, cannot manipulate each other, we have to have an open and honest dialogue, and I found yesterday's staments at the press conference frankly very disturbing."

He condemned Bush's admission that in making last week's statement about Rumsfeld, he had known he was being misleading.

"It's inappropriate to cleverly come out the day after an election to do something we were told before the election would not be done," Gingrich said. "I think the timing was exactly backwards and I hope the President will rethink how he engages the American people and how he communicates with candor."

He contrasted the euphoria of 1994, when his Contract with America agenda helped ended decades of Democratic rule in the House, with the bitterness of Tuesday night's Democratic sweep.

"I remember what it felt like the night we were at the Cobb Galleria and for the first time in 40 years we won control of the House and (there was) the Contract with America and people were very exicted about welfare reform and cutting taxes and balancing the budget and all those things, and I have to say 12 years later that I'm very disappointed, but if you look at what I've said all year, I'm not surprised."

As for whatRepublicans should do now, he said, "I believe the House and Senate Republicans and the White House need to take a deep breath and think very seriously about this election result, because I think we're at a very important turning point this is either a temporary interruption of what has been a gradually consolidating center-right majority, or this is a breakdown of that center-right majority leading to a significant effort to establish a center-left government majority."


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: bushapologist; captobvious; gingrich; newt; newtgingrich; skyisblue; sunsetsinthewest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461-471 next last
To: DaiHuy

The President knew exactly what he was doing, he wanted to get rid of that pesky Republican congress so he could get his Illegal Amnesty bill passed.

He was almost giddy at the prospect of giving the Dems everything they want, especially the Amnesty bill.


..............

I COMPLETELY agree with your assessment but it isn't very popular with most Republicans.


61 posted on 11/10/2006 7:16:23 AM PST by MrRights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: moose2004

Mike Pence

Never heard of him (except until yesterday) imagine the name recognition he must have with the average American voter who doesnt go to places such as FR


62 posted on 11/10/2006 7:16:41 AM PST by MaineVoter2002 (Election 2006 - Democrat Win, Conservative Mandate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Hey newt, how original of you to come out and trash Bush after the loss. I cannot believe the Bush-hate I have been reading from freepers as well.
Wow...no wonder they call this the stupid party.


63 posted on 11/10/2006 7:16:42 AM PST by jackv (just shakin' my head)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mtairycitizen
"Did he serve divorce papers on his sick wife?
Or was that JOhn Kerry?"

This isn't fair. On Free Republic, we observe, the immoral and vulgar is acceptable. Certainly divorce should not be used against a man.
64 posted on 11/10/2006 7:16:43 AM PST by Free Baptist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

It wasn't a big duh to the morons in the White House, apparently. George Allen would be in the Senate next year if they'd properly tossed Rumsfeld aside.


65 posted on 11/10/2006 7:17:09 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MAD-AS-HELL
Gingrich is right

Damn right he is. Hell, if the Dems had people of his vision and intellect, the GOP would go the way of the whigs.
It bothers me that we have to hold all of our people to some supra human standard while the dems let drunken trash and pornographers rise as high as they like so as to benefit the party. I'm separating what a man does in his private life with his marital partners.
Hell, if I vetted employees in this manner I'd have nobody except Jehovah witnesses in my employ.

Newt is an unvarnished political genius. - And he doesn't drive cars off cliffs with his bimbos. That would be a crime, now wouldn't it? - and that, to me, should disqualify someone for office, not having more than one wife.

It's inappropriate to cleverly come out the day after an election to do something we were told before the election would not be done,"

Damn right

66 posted on 11/10/2006 7:17:18 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ilgipper

Now we have some agenda pushers in there!
lets list some items on our new agenda!
Gay gay gay 24hrs a day!
Higher taxes!
Reparations for slavery!
Impeachment!
Open Borders ,undocumented persons will step to the front of the line please!
Even higher taxes!
More Gay stuff
oh yeah de-fund the military!
DUmmies on the intelligence comittie!
bi monthly increases in the minimum wage!
oh yes higher taxes!
Islamic studies in public school!


67 posted on 11/10/2006 7:17:21 AM PST by claptrap (optional tag-line under reconsideration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

He's right. The GOP squandered the opportunity of the century to pack it to the rat party. Yes, that is what it is about. Don't believe that? Just look at what the dems have done over and over to get back power. They are up front, in your face and never back down and make nice. Just as it is when dealing with terrorists, when they slap you slap them back, don't try to ignore it in order to "not stoop to their level". When the dems lie, bring it up front and scream it in their face that they are liars and let the world know why they are liars. When the dems hit you, hit them back harder and repeatedly. Quit being wusses, if the dems don't like something, shove it in their faces. Veto their pet bills, use their tactics such as fillibustering judges against them now that the GOP is in the minority. Do IT! They did it and obviously gained no ill will from the electorate. Finally, now is the time to rid ourselves of the rinos. Kick the asses of the state GOP to get rid of the Hagels and McCains.

The bottom line is that the dems are NOT our friends, never have been and never will be. The goal always should be to defeat them and not to bow to them. GET SOME NADS GOP AND FIGHT!


68 posted on 11/10/2006 7:17:53 AM PST by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

> Newt needs to have a nice cup of STFU.

Newt appears to have forgotten the 11th Commandment: Thou shalt not speak ill of a fellow Republican.


69 posted on 11/10/2006 7:18:15 AM PST by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

Dang you liberal-like idiots. I knew that's all a bunch of you would have as a response to Newt. "How many ex-wives blah blah blah."

Can't refute his ideas so you start with the personal attacks. Shame. Shame. Shame.

Newt 100% spot on.


70 posted on 11/10/2006 7:18:17 AM PST by PjhCPA (Who will be the next Ronald Reagan? We'd better find him. SOON!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
President Bush himself said he was partially responsible for the losses of the majority.

As far as the timing of the Rumsfeld's departure, no time was good. If it was announced two weeks before the elections, it would've been a "stunt". Maybe if it had been done at the start of the year, or the start of the spring...some time before the general public began to notice the campaigns, then the new SecDef might have had a chance to put another face on the war.

Let me make it clear: I think Rummy is a great guy and did a fantastic job. The politics of the situation, though, would have been better if he had left earlier.

Of course, I don't think anyone went to the ballot box thinking about Rumsfeld...just the "war" in general.

Another thing that the Republicans SHOULD have done but didn't: point out the Democrats' hatred of the troops--Durbin's comments, Kennedy's comments, Murtha's comments, Kerry's comments...all were fodder for showing how the Democrats don't really support American military success. But the REPUBLICANS were too sensitive, and didn't want to "question the patriotism" of the traitorous 'rats.

So, here we are. Let's do our best to change course in two years.

71 posted on 11/10/2006 7:19:16 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Every so often we get someone that can make real a difference only to have them to self destruct on the launching pad. Newt, we really need you back then, but we don't need you now. Stay at the university and teach the kids how the government should work and not to screw up while millions are counting on you.
72 posted on 11/10/2006 7:19:18 AM PST by oyez (Why is it that egalitarians act like royalty?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
Pres Bush waited until the day after the election because he didn't think it was fair to inject the effect of removing Rumsfeld into the election.

You believe that lie? They lied to us because they believed that the lie would keep Republicans motivated to vote on Tuesday and that firing Rumsfeld would demoralize Republicans. It was all politics.

73 posted on 11/10/2006 7:19:23 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"Gingrich says"

Newt, STFU.

Give me your plan, not who you blame.

You will never sit behind the desk of the oval office.

Reagan would shake his head and turn his back on you, as I have done.

74 posted on 11/10/2006 7:19:49 AM PST by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Newt would not get my vote either!

George W. Bush is STILL our President. We are still at WAR. We don't need to start eating ourselves. Newt never learns from his mistakes. He can hide ego to be President for only so long and then the vicious side of him comes out.

If I hear him one more time on Hannity, I'm going to start to start listening to Jerry Garcia and the Greatful Dead.


75 posted on 11/10/2006 7:20:03 AM PST by not2worry (What goes around comes around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Taking questions after a medical forum, the former GOP congressman from Cobb County said four c's — an absence of competence in Republican performance, an absence of candor, corruption and the bad advice of consultants — led to Tuesday's defeat.

Remind me again ... the reason he had to resign from Congress was ????

76 posted on 11/10/2006 7:20:06 AM PST by Mo1 (Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is 2 heart beats away from the Presidency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78

I know this is tough to air out in the open and I think Newt should think before he says things but he is telling the truth.

Bush was the leader of the Republican Party (whether you like it or not) and he did take responsiblity for the election results. Compassionate conservatism and trying to "split the baby down the middle" does not work. Bush needed his conservative base to come out in this election (especially in a mid-term) and they were not convinced are excited about what Republicans have been doing.

A wake up call is a good thing ever once in a while. I just hope we will not be paying very long for this mistake.


77 posted on 11/10/2006 7:20:53 AM PST by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

a blind squirrel finds a nut from time to time. Arnold just twists to accommodate our radical left wing legislature run by people who want to make California part of Mexico again.


78 posted on 11/10/2006 7:21:09 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL (How does one win over terrorists? KILL them with UNKINDNESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Halls
Newt is a decent guy, but any man who has 2 ex wives shows he is lacking in commitment and responsbility, therefore I would never vote for him.

That Reagan feller had an ex-wife, too. Should have scratched him off, I guess. Or is one lack of commitment o.k., but two is not?
79 posted on 11/10/2006 7:21:23 AM PST by horse_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

He's got my vote if he runs.


80 posted on 11/10/2006 7:22:19 AM PST by chad_in_georgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 461-471 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson