The difference between the 1975 betrayal of America's warriors and the 2006 betrayal is that Charlie didn't want to follow us home and kill more of us.
These "conservatives" were actively working to defeat America's warriors. I want them to get the full benefit of their doing so. That's not extreme; it's just.
The difference between the 1975 betrayal of America's warriors and the 2006 betrayal is that Charlie didn't want to follow us home and kill more of us.Your first paragraph is 100% correct.These "conservatives" were actively working to defeat America's warriors. I want them to get the full benefit of their doing so. That's not extreme; it's just.
And it's true that many people in America, both dhimmicrats and "Republicans" are useful idiots for the Jihad.
But in the case of those you label "conservative", I think perhaps that they erred tactically, not stategically. Unlike RINOs and RATs, those conservatives who lost sight of the big electoral picture and concentrated on in-house bickering, were not "actively working to defeat America's warriors".
I know the effect is the same, but the intention is different. Does that difference not matter to you?
And aren't you unduly contributing to in-house bickering yourself, by publicly wishing radiation death for people who are, essentially, on the same side as us?
That's what I mean by "extreme".