Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: floridareader1
Both Newt Gingrich and Dick Morris have stated that had Bush removed Rumsfeld a month before the election, the Republicans would have kept control of the Senate and saved at least 5 GOP seats.

B.S. Cutting Rusfeld would have been played as a sign of weakness and doubt by the media. It would not have helped at all.

18 posted on 11/10/2006 4:29:55 AM PST by GOP_Party_Animal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: GOP_Party_Animal

B.S. Cutting Rumsfeld would have been played as a sign of weakness and doubt by the media. It would not have helped at all.


But cutting Rumsfield immediately after the election is a sign of strength?

There is no question the GOP would control the Senate if he had made the decision before the election. Can we pin this one on Karl Rove?


27 posted on 11/10/2006 4:34:25 AM PST by floridareader1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson