To: Tarheel
It would be pretty ironic if the libertarian candidate ended up being the difference, and JD lost.
I'm sure they will be proud to have taught JD a lesson.
*rolling eyes*
13 posted on
11/09/2006 6:55:41 PM PST by
Lakeshark
(Thank a member of the US armed forces for their sacrifice)
To: Lakeshark
Apparently Soros is bank rolling Libertarian candidates so that we go down.
19 posted on
11/09/2006 7:02:51 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Lakeshark
It would be pretty ironic if the libertarian candidate ended up being the difference, and JD lost. That's exactly what happened in Montana, where the Libertarian received around 10,000 votes and Burns lost by around 3000 votes.
Yet some Dems are screaming MANDATE?
26 posted on
11/09/2006 7:10:03 PM PST by
Carling
(It's Danny, Sir)
To: Lakeshark
It would be pretty ironic if the libertarian candidate ended up being the difference, and JD lost. I'm sure they will be proud to have taught JD a lesson.
Actually if they make enough votes to have swung the election, they consider that a major victory. They say this and write about it.
Their highest ambition is to be spoilers. For either party.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson