Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jrabbit
Why, once the head has been delivered, is it necessary to "crush" the babys' head? To murder the baby? To make damn sure the baby has 0 chance of life?

Of course, why else would the birthing process not be allowed to proceed normally and deliver a live, healthy baby that thousands of childless couples are eagerly waiting to adopt if the mother doesn't want him or her?

This "medical procedure" is nothing less than deliberate murder with malice aforethought of an innocent, helpless baby as he or she struggles into the world and promptly gets it's head crushed for it's trouble. According to testimony before Congress by physicians who have no financial stake in the abortion mill industry, the "procedure" is very rarely, if ever, medically necessary to save the mother's life. People with a drop of normal human compassion for a helpless infant in their veins wouldn't allow that kind of inhuman cruelty to be inflicted on a puppy, much less a human baby.

47 posted on 11/09/2006 10:57:47 PM PST by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: epow

I do not...cannot...comprehend such cruelty. The head is the largest part of a newborn. Once it has been delivered, what is the "danger" to the woman if the rest of the baby is born? This is nothing more than infanticide. The purpose is to make damn sure the baby is fully delivered....dead. Such cruelty is reserved to those who have some deep mental malady. I can't explain it any other way.


48 posted on 11/10/2006 12:09:54 AM PST by Jrabbit (Scuse me??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson