Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phsstpok
They should have supported Lafee instead

He'd have not had a chance either. No, R.I. should have been a total write off as a hopelessly blue state and any money put into this race should have been spent to save Santorum, Allen, Talent or even Dewine.

139 posted on 11/09/2006 4:03:08 PM PST by MikeA (Where's the media to call the elections a "temper tantrum" by America like they did in 1994?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]


To: MikeA
(Lafee would) have not had a chance either. No, R.I. should have been a total write off as a hopelessly blue state and any money put into this race should have been spent to save Santorum, Allen, Talent or even Dewine.

Agreed, but supporting Lafee over Chafee would have stuck to principle.  Support for Chafee added to the (correct) impression that Republicans this year were more interested in holding on to power than in doing the right thing.  That hurt us in other races, including the ones you mention.

158 posted on 11/09/2006 4:30:39 PM PST by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson