Replies

Why did Clinton go into the Balkins over a hyped and nonexistent genocide? Why did Clinton do little, or nothing effective, against other known terrorists attacks on U.S. citizens, U.S. Embassies (an embassy is considered an extension of that country' soil so it was as if they had attacked America, ala 9/11), and a U.S. Naval vessel, the Cole, and why did he treat the first World trade Center bombing as a criminal act rather than a terrorist attack after bin Laden had declared war on the USA verbally? I suggest it was because he was currying favor with the Muslims, especially Arafat, in hopes of an Israel-PLA peace accord and a Nobel Prize for himself, as if that is worth anything anymore.

The Oklahoma City bombing of the Murrah Federal Building fits the same cover up MO.

My first indication that the course of the investigation of flt.800 was the appearance of the top FBI man for NY on TV right after the crash. He looked confident and determined when he said, "We will get the people who did this, all of them." Shortly afterward he looked crestfallen and quiet and then he disappeared from public view altogether.

Shortly afterward he looked crestfallen and quiet and then he disappeared from public view altogether.

OK, but I'm willing to concede his demeanor changed when he was taken aside and pulled up short for talking out of his @$$, when there was no reason to make that statement.

As far as Clinton's grand plan to curry favor with Muslims, it didn't turn out so well if that was his plan.