Well, I guess civility is too much to expect.
You go right on believing that AV fuel can spontaneously combust if that makes you feel better.
I don't believe anything about this case because it makes me feel better, I believe it because the evidence supports it.
Oh, and did I mention I was the assistant crew chief of a KC-135R named The Spirit of Plattsburgh? A question for you to consider is why a aviation mechanic for heavy jets that haul a whole lot of fuel would think the NTSB is correct. You might want to ask, "why would a heavy jet aviation mechanic believe that an airframe 30,000 flight hours and 5 calendar years past its recommended retirement might have some mechanical problems?" Meanwhile, you guys have a theory that depends on an unobserved missile launch from a densely populated area and/or a terrorist network that could kill airliners at will and only did it once.