Your post abandons rational thought, given the mountain of evidence contrary to your positions. As such, I am not inclined to waste time with a reponse to each point. However, read and learn.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1632758/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638411/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1637450/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1636823/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1637441/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1638077/posts
So in other words you can't point to the provisions in the bill itself?
The only positions I put forth were that most Americans favored a comprehensive package which included some version of the Senate bill. I gave you proof of that and offered more. I also stated that the fence, security, and enforcement would be a large part of the price tag. Finally, I took the position that I doubt you will be thrilled with what the Dems come up with. Which of those abandons rational thought?
Now that you've insulted me, at least enlighten me.