Posted on 11/09/2006 7:16:52 AM PST by .cnI redruM
The head of a U. S. government task force on higher education suggests that if the Ivory Tower cannot get its act together, it may face a version of what the health care industry is confronting—HMOs.
“The American Association of Universities criticized our tone,” Charles Miller said on October 25th at the Capital Hilton. “They said that 17 of the top 20 universities in the world are in the United States.”
“They quoted a Shanghai University ranking,” he told the audience. “Isn’t it ironic that the only ranking they could use that showed them in a good light came from a communist totalitarian system?”
He served as chairman of the U. S. Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. A retired businessman, he has found his dealings with the higher education establishment frustrating.
Miller formerly served as the chair of the University of Texas Board of Regents. “I spent a number of years as a financial analyst and anytime I asked to see the books I found them opaque,” Miller remembered. “The administration didn’t understand them either and seemed to like it that way.”
“I couldn’t get any information on student learning except grades, degrees and ‘see time,’ all of which are no longer relevant.”
Now looking at the nation’s campuses for U. S. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings, Miller sees the same problems multiplied. “There are those who complain that the philosophy of the university leans 85% one way,” Miller told the crowd at the event sponsored by the Education Sector. “We didn’t even look into that.”
“It took as long for the AAU to get data as it took for the U. S. government to build the atomic bomb in the Second World War.” Miller offered this observation is response to a question raised by an AAU representative. The Education Sector itself is a group founded by a former advisor to President Clinton—Andrew Rotterham.
Ultimately, Miller warns, the failure of the higher education establishment to measure its own success, or lack thereof, may be the undoing of the Ivory Tower itself. “If the academy doesn’t come up with an assessment test, it’s going to be done for them,” he warned the crowd, which consisted of many higher education lobbyists.
“I think that is already happening in health care,” he said when I asked him who would police the academy in his receivership scenario. “Ask anyone and they will tell you that medicine has changed in the last 20 years.”
“HMOs started due to the rage over the failure to cut costs.” Does that mean that, in similar fashion, professors and their protectors can look forward to EMOs, or Education Maintenance Organizations, governing them? “I see versions of that at the state level.”
“If that happens, then schools will lose their autonomy.” Miller drew the analogy to health care because he sees the same endemic problems with both hospitals and colleges: “Third party payments are a fault of the system.”
“Third party payments” occur when someone other than the consumer pays for the good or service at the point of consumption. In higher education, the consumer would be the student or the student’s parents.
As it happens, despite the attention given the explosion in college costs, the proportion paid by students does not make up the lion’s share of the price tag. “Sixty-five percent of average family income is eaten up by the sticker price of college but only 25% of average family income is eaten up by the net price of college,” the president of Vassar said last month.
Dr. Wilfredo Nieves, the president of Middlesex Community College in Connecticut, points out that for Latinos that latter percentage is closer to 30. Nonetheless, “The former [share of family income] looks hopeless, the latter considerably less so,” Vassar president Catherine Hill concludes. “Moreover, since the start of the decade, that share has fallen.”
And, “Some schools are charging low-income students only $1,000 on a $33,000 tab,” Dr. Hill said at the National Press Club. Indeed, even allowing that this may be the exception rather than the rule, the difference between the sticker and net price of college, as laid out by the College Board, is stark.
For example, the sticker price of a four-year private college is $22,218 while the net is closer to $13,000. Similarly, at four-year public colleges, the sticker price— $5,836—is more than double the net—$2,700.
The questions to keep in mind here are A) What is the delta? (9.21$K for private or about 40%; amd $3.13K for public or a scary 55%)
and
B) What intrests of the the Third-Party Payer get messaged? Do they have anything to do with our colleges turning out smarter and better people?
That Sallie Mae is a seductive siren. Just sign the papers and she owns you. ;-)
No. Like many college graduates, I have too many horror stories of what happened when students received "third-party money".
Tell me about it! I just payed them off 6 months ago. I felt like I had just dropped my ruck after a ten K road march.
You got it. I worked hard to keep my academic scholarship and watched those around me fill out (and falsify) forms. Of course, I'm the one laughing now because I have no debt.
The cost of education is one of my soap box issues. I can't beleive it costs as much as it does and certainly don't think the product has shown its worth. I think the schools and the banks have been looting the taxpayer for years now. The cost of education will continue to go up as long as the Gov't encourages continued borrowing.
The comparison to health care on this is impossible to miss.
Agreed big time. I guess the faculty tend to be socialist,
since they are basically supported on the public dime for
their work. That used to be honorable, but it's turned
into the playground for ideologues, and iconoclasts. As if
iconoclastic behaviour is alway correct.
No, you might not get the best researchers teaching, but how much cutting edge research is really useful for sophmore level chemistry? Since you are just teaching students instead of feeding them, caring for them, housing them and doing research costs can drop quite a bit.
That would be an interesting business model. The only problem I see with it is the accreditation system.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.