Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: excludethis
Tester actually seems to be, at least publically, at least as strong against illegal immigration as Burns was:

From Tester's web site:
Our first priority must be to secure ports and borders to keep out terror threats, illegal drugs and illegal immigrants. Jon Tester opposes amnesty for those who are here illegally. People who want to come to America should follow the rules — and we should enforce them. There should be no cuts in line. Moreover, hiring illegal aliens is no joking matter. Tester believes we need to enforce the law on employers who hire illegal immigrants no matter who they are. It’s not just a matter of fairness — it’s a question of national security.
Brown also has a slightly better voting record on amnesties than DeWine did.
46 posted on 11/09/2006 3:50:29 AM PST by ruination
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: ruination

It doesn't matter about the members in the party, it matters who controls the agenda.

The gop house was a firewall against amnesty.

McConnell would have also been better and listened more to conservatives than Harry Reid leading the senate.

Gop districts don't vote for party while dem districts vote for party. That has lead us to pelosi and reid.


56 posted on 11/09/2006 3:58:52 AM PST by jamesrichards
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson