Dems Pledge to Scrutinize Big Business

AP via Yahoo Finance ^ | 8 November 2006 | Brad Foss

[comebacknewt]

"Government spending" to Dems is "tax cuts".

They will be sure to hold those in check.

[Alberta's Child]

. . . old drum-skin face Pelosi . . .

Holy sh!t -- I nearly peed on the floor laughing at this one. LOL!!

[goodnesswins]

Actually, now that I think about it.....many of these companies have toed(sp) the Demo line....Affirmative Action, Gay partner bennies, supporting defeatest issues...maybe they deserve this.....Payback is a b*tch.

[conservative in nyc]

DEMS PLEDGE TO SCRUTINIZE BIG BUSINESS

Why not the small ones? Isn't that discrimination?

Don't worry. Small Businesses will get theirs too under the "New" Democrats - it's called a "roll-back" of tax cuts for the so-called "rich". And since the federal government ain't Wal*Mart, roll-backs aren't a good thing.

[raybbr]

Holy sh!t -- I nearly peed on the floor laughing at this one. LOL!!

Glad I could put a smile on your face on this day of melancholy.

[Repub4bush]

I'm thinking that after about 6 months, the MSM will get bored with her and the gang, and start checking them out too.

I mean face it, what reason is there to keep going after Bush now?

This is barring a Watergate redo of course.

[Hildy]

And the irony of all irony is that the vineyard does not use Union Workers!!!

[bybybill]

The biggest fears we have about the economy are inflation, unemployment, costly lawsuits and regualtion, higher taxes and fuel costs, high medical expenses, increasing interest rates. Gee, doesn`t that sound like San Fran Nancy`s economic plan?

[kcar]

First order of the day: attack all of the big Republican corporate sponsors!

Second order of the day: enact legislation moving money around to Democrat sponsors!

Third order of the day: Scrap the fence idea and let the mass migration of next year's new voters begin!

[Defender2]

Communism On The March!!!!

[Nazarene]

Hey all those facelifts can't be cheap.

[bybybill]

Time to sell the WalMart stock.

[skr]

I'm afraid it does.

[rivercat]

Which vineyard? So I don't buy any...

[rivercat]

Oh, she owns 9 acres of grapes, and doesn't own a winery.

[tiger-one]

Time to boycott those business she has a stake in. Plus look for corruption within them and those who manage them.

[claudiustg]

---I mean face it, what reason is there to keep going after Bush now?---

They need to keep kicking Bush to keep your eyes off the things the Dims are actually doing.

[Obie Wan]

There you go, back in power 5 minutes and it's time to see what they can ring out of private sector businesses.Well America you voted for these charmers, enjoy the ride !!!

[villagerjoel]

Did they even mention any of this during their campaigns? I'll be honest, I wasn't listening to what they were saying, but I get the impression they've gone crazy with power.

[Tarnsman]

Remember these numbers: 60, 67 and 291. 60 votes needed to end a filibuster (Dems have 51), 67 and 291 the numbers of votes in the Senate and the House to override a Presidential veto. Think the Dems need to refer to their pocket editions of the Constitution. Dems played delay and block for the last six years. Now it's our turn. Bottomline: they have to play nice if they are going to get anything enacted. Bush still controls the ball. Oh, and if they block his judical appointments he only has to wait until they recess and then recess appoint them using his Constitution powers.