Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justiceseeker93

Schumer also said that if GWB had fired Rumsfeld back in September or October, and not the day after the election, the GOP would have kept control of both the Senate and the House.

GWB hurt us bad on that one. And if he had vetoed some of those damn spending bills.

The buck stops at GWB.


242 posted on 11/08/2006 9:12:15 PM PST by floridareader1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]


To: floridareader1
Yes, it's about time for GWB to find that old "veto" stamp in his desk and use it often in the next two years!

He would certainly figure to have enough votes in the new Congress to assure that his vetoes will generally not be overridden.

243 posted on 11/08/2006 9:19:42 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

To: floridareader1
Schumer also said that if GWB had fired Rumsfeld back in September or October, and not the day after the election, the GOP would have kept control of both the Senate and the House.

How nice for Chuckie to give "friendly" advice as he gloated in his glory!

Don't think firing Rumsfeld back then would have done anything but hurt the GOP. The 'Rats would have jumped on it as a move made desperately for political gain, and they'd be right on that one. And Bush would be perceived within GOP ranks as a backstabber. Plus it would have had a negative impact on the military's morale.

246 posted on 11/08/2006 10:04:13 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson