Skip to comments.
Historic Victory for Diebold! [Ann Coulter]
Human Events ^
| 11/8/06
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 11/08/2006 3:58:41 PM PST by pissant
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-207 next last
Annie's take on the 2006 massacre.
1
posted on
11/08/2006 3:58:42 PM PST
by
pissant
To: pissant
Ann, you helped bring this about--and you did so solely to get people to read your columns. Treason is bad enough. Treason solely for personal monetary gain is worse.
To: pissant
Gotta love her. We all noticed that this was a fraud free election cycle! LOL Imagine that!
3
posted on
11/08/2006 4:02:55 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(RIP my precious Lamb Chop)
To: pissant
And a good and appropriate take it is.
4
posted on
11/08/2006 4:03:07 PM PST
by
Tribune7
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
She was on Drudge's radio show and predicted this two-three weeks ago.
5
posted on
11/08/2006 4:03:23 PM PST
by
Perdogg
(Democratic Party - The political wing of Al Qaida)
To: pissant
"gun totin' Democrats" to be fitted for leotards. Before January after Nancy castrates them.
6
posted on
11/08/2006 4:03:42 PM PST
by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
The GOP has only itself to blame. While some good Pubs lost, a lot of not so good ones were weeded out.
7
posted on
11/08/2006 4:05:46 PM PST
by
Tribune7
To: Perdogg
She was on Drudge's radio show and predicted this two-three weeks ago. Of course. She was industriously working for it.
To: Tribune7
Being as we lost anyway its too bad the Maine girls didnt get weeded.
9
posted on
11/08/2006 4:08:55 PM PST
by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: Tribune7
The GOP has only itself to blame. While some good Pubs lost, a lot of not so good ones were weeded out.OK, so you're saying that as long as Republicans you disliked were tossed, losing the war on terror is OK. Got it.
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Treason is bad enough. Treason solely for personal monetary gain is worse.What are you talking about? Treason was a good book and under our system you can write books for monetary gain.
11
posted on
11/08/2006 4:11:10 PM PST
by
Poincare
To: Poincare
What are you talking about? Treason was a good book and under our system you can write books for monetary gain.Ann Coulter willfully aided and abetted the Democrats in regaining Congress.
I dare call it treason.
To: pissant
I guess Diebold has finally been vindicated
Don't believe it. Its a secret Rovian plot to instill confidence in Diebold two years before the REAL prize. Mwahahahahahaaaaaaa....
13
posted on
11/08/2006 4:12:33 PM PST
by
xroadie
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
And you're saying a particularly acerbic yet talented conservative commentator committed treason and lost the war on terror by writing nasty things about liberals & democrats in her column.
Where the h*ll are you coming from?
14
posted on
11/08/2006 4:13:54 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: skeeter
Where the h*ll are you coming from?Treason includes adhering to the enemies of the United States, giving them aid and comfort. That's what the Democrats are doing, and Ann Coulter willfully assisted them in doing that.
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
16
posted on
11/08/2006 4:15:54 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: skeeter
How so? Spell it out.She consistently worked her (extremely) little butt off to ensure that conservatives were PO'd and unwilling to vote for Republicans in the general election, and thus ensured the election of Democrats, and she did this solely to boost her sales.
Handing power to the Democrats is constructive treason--hell, even Ann has said so. They stabbed our military in the back in Vietnam, and they're going to do it in Iraq. They give victory to the enemy. That's "giving aid and comfort."
She's worked very hard to do just that.
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Ann Coulter willfully aided and abetted the Democrats in regaining Congress.Now how did she do that? Certainly not by writing the book Treason, which reminds me by the way, I have this book entitled Behold a Pale Horse.
18
posted on
11/08/2006 4:23:27 PM PST
by
Poincare
To: Poincare
Now how did she do that? Certainly not by writing the book Treason, which reminds me by the way, I have this book entitled Behold a Pale Horse.I was speaking of Ann Coulter committing treason, not writing the book Treason, where she cheerfully argued exactly what I'm saying about the Democrats she willfully helped to elect.
To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Thats some tortured logic there. I do not think conservatives can be so easily led. Ann spoke to an underserved constituency. If she didn't someone else would.
You could just as easily make the case the moderate wing of our party committed treason by disenfranchizing the right wing. Both arguments are equally accurate.
20
posted on
11/08/2006 4:25:58 PM PST
by
skeeter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-207 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson