To: MinnesotaLibertarian
I must say...if Rumsfeld was going to go anyway, why couldn't it have been BEFORE the election? That might've made a difference. Exactly. This just compounds the appearance of incompetence, failure and defeat. I am sick to my stomach. What are they thinking? If now, then why not back then? Unbelievable!
To: redgirlinabluestate
If Bush had done this before the elections the liberals would have beat him and all republicans over the head with it.
65 posted on
11/08/2006 10:09:56 AM PST by
subterfuge
(Tolerance has become the greatest virtue, and hypocrisy the worst character defect.)
To: redgirlinabluestate
Did you hear the president's reasons?
Comments?
157 posted on
11/08/2006 10:44:45 AM PST by
allen08gop
("Woman is the most powerful magnet in the universe... and all men are cheap metal!")
To: redgirlinabluestate
This just compounds the appearance of incompetence, failure and defeat.There was no "appearance," Rumsfeld needed to go. He failed to prosecute the war aggressively enough.
215 posted on
11/08/2006 12:08:01 PM PST by
Terabitten
(Be humble and be kind.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson