Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Robert Gates to be named Secretary of Defense
Perdogg

Posted on 11/08/2006 9:58:53 AM PST by Perdogg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-285 next last
To: P-Marlowe; Dr. Eckleburg

I think Gates needs to be given a chance.

More importantly, I think this nation has been at war 4 years in Iraq. That is as long as WWII. It's time to WIN this thing and wrap it up.

We need to:

1. Develop a winning strategy.
2. Execute it.
3. Wrap it up and move on.

Possibilities:

a. Assume a Cold War strategy of wearing down the Islamo-fascists.
b. Go on the offensive in a "take out the bad governments (Iran, Syria, Saudi, Sudan, Somalia)" strategy.
c. Partitioning of Iraq with border forces defending against and infiltrating of Iran.
d. Continuation of "condone, conquer, control" city by city.
e. others?


241 posted on 11/08/2006 2:15:57 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Most 6th year elections are referendums of a sort. Politics is a pendulum.

Frankly, we didn't get railed as hard as Eisenhower in '58 and Reagan in '86, or even Nixon in '74.


242 posted on 11/08/2006 2:20:56 PM PST by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: zendari

No, would have been nice if the hit was one Senator less though.


243 posted on 11/08/2006 2:22:48 PM PST by SJackson ( There is no threat. Communists are not about to take over our McDonald hamburger stands. John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: xzins

I'm speculating, but I think the policy changes are a done thing, drawn from the bi-partisan Iraq study group, and that Gates was pulled from the group to implement them. We'll know within the week.


244 posted on 11/08/2006 2:26:37 PM PST by SJackson ( There is no threat. Communists are not about to take over our McDonald hamburger stands. John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: xzins
a. Assume a Cold War strategy of wearing down the Islamo-fascists.

That won't work because you cannot wear them down. Islamofacists are willing to sacrifice their own children in order to kill and maim other people's children. These people reproduce faster than we can wear them out.

b. Go on the offensive in a "take out the bad governments (Iran, Syria, Saudi, Sudan, Somalia)" strategy.

That would work, but America does not have the stomach for it. Indeed that is the plan that is necessary, but until we see buildings falling in our country on a monthly basis, I don't see us taking the offensive against any other countries. Besides, in order to do it, you need the express consent of congress, which won't happen under this new gang of fools.

c. Partitioning of Iraq with border forces defending against and infiltrating of Iran.

I think you are close there. Quite frankly we need to go back to ancient history and see how places like Baghdad were conquered by people like Alexander. I would suggest pulling all American troops out of the Sunni Triangle and laying siege to the area until the insurgents are tired of killing each other. When there is nothing left but women and children and old men, then I think you may see peace in that area.

d. Continuation of "condone, conquer, control" city by city.

We have not been able to do that in Baghdad and at this point Baghdad is the only really significant problem. Solve that and you've solved 90 % of the problem.

e. others?

The Dresden solution.

245 posted on 11/08/2006 2:29:21 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: amchugh
Your second post in four years and you use it to put Rummy down.......get lost Troll.
246 posted on 11/08/2006 2:41:06 PM PST by AmeriBrit (Soros and Clinton's for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington = SCREW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Prayers up for Dr. Gates!


247 posted on 11/08/2006 3:02:42 PM PST by Rte66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmeriBrit

I'm looking for a debate, not an argument. If that makes me a troll, so be it. I don't come to freerepublic that often because I'm a moderate, but I do like to hear what the right, and far right are saying. There are a lot of great ideas here, even if I disagree with some, and some great discussions of political tactics, which interests me.

I think the support of Rumsfeld when it was no longer politically expedient was a small part of this election result, and I wonder why so many people here support him so enthusiastically. It seems like most of those with military experience thought he didn't prosecute the war aggressively enough. The ones who do support him seem to just like the way he sounds in a press conference. I'd like the opinion of a military strategist or historian on his actual accomplishments.

BTW, you should welcome trolls here, there's not much point in trying to sharpen your knives on straw men.


248 posted on 11/08/2006 3:16:42 PM PST by amchugh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: lepton
He is the legacy of today's CIA. But think about this: his claim to fame is that he rose through the ranks of a government bureaucracy. He's not just mediocre, he excels at it. So, he knows how to glad-hand. He's an inside pole hack. It will do him well COMPROMISING our military for the next budget item perk.

~faith.
249 posted on 11/08/2006 3:28:40 PM PST by ziravan (winning the lotto one vote at a time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: kevao

God bless Rumsfeld. A Great American.


250 posted on 11/08/2006 3:36:03 PM PST by free_life
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten
There was no "appearance," Rumsfeld needed to go. He failed to prosecute the war aggressively enough.

If that is true, then it did not become readily apparent to Bush overnight, did it? If Rumsfeld needed to go, then he needed to go for policy reasons months ago, not for political reasons today. That's all.

251 posted on 11/08/2006 3:36:49 PM PST by redgirlinabluestate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Obviously Gates is a socialist and globalist(RINO)..
Appointed by the White RINO House..

As are very probably the two stealth Supremes Bush had installed..

252 posted on 11/08/2006 3:44:31 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

The replacement of Rumsfeld with Gates is significant, especially coming as it does over Cheney's objections. So is Bush's statement today in which he indicated that the administration will partner closely with the Baker Iraq study group in which Gates has been involved.

Reading the tea leaves, Bush seems to have lost faith in the neocons and Jim Baker's crew of realist conservatives is taking over. This will be confirmed if Gates purges the senior civilian staff at the Pentagon (like Cambone). Another way of looking at it is that the real power brokers from Wall Street and Big Oil have sent Baker's boys in to preserve our national interests in the Middle East. Bush may have been placed under heavy duress to make this move.

You may recall that Jim Baker has been on the outs with the neocons ever since he essentially told the Israelis to stuff it when he was Secretary of State. I can't say that I'm unhappy seeing him back in the mix.


253 posted on 11/08/2006 3:49:55 PM PST by Asceticon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveLoneRanger
I'll miss the Rummy poetry.

Here youe have Donald Rumsfeld Quotes

254 posted on 11/08/2006 4:08:39 PM PST by A. Pole (Thomas Jefferson: "Merchants have no country.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lizarde
Not that this is going to change anything substantial, but Lieberman received more votes from Republicans than Democrats by 10%.

You can count on the fact that Lieberman will be looking for their votes in 6 years again. He has to as an Independent. He won't be able to get reelection if a strong Pub comes up in a good year for the GOP unless he heads it off at the pass with a partial pro Pub stance on several issues. He's not a Dem anymore and you know the Dems are going to target his a*s big time to get him out and as the election results show, Lieberman can no longer depend on Democrats to get him elected. Those days are behind him now.

Bottom line, when he said he's going to be more independent than ever before today, he means it, because he has to to survive.

Just an observation

255 posted on 11/08/2006 4:32:25 PM PST by Bassfan (No cheese please)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe; blue-duncan
I wasn't speaking against Gates.

I was just generally venting. My prayer was for protection from Pelosi and Clinton Deux and Reid and Conyers, ad nauseum.
256 posted on 11/08/2006 4:47:41 PM PST by Dr. Eckleburg ("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: ziravan
He is the legacy of today's CIA. But think about this: his claim to fame is that he rose through the ranks of a government bureaucracy. He's not just mediocre, he excels at it. So, he knows how to glad-hand. He's an inside pole hack. It will do him well COMPROMISING our military for the next budget item perk.

O.K., but I don't think he can really be directly blamed for Tenet's overstatement of WMD information specificity.

257 posted on 11/08/2006 4:49:10 PM PST by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Overlord Pelosi says the Senate has to investigate him first....surely the first Borking of the new Defeatocrat reign.


258 posted on 11/08/2006 4:57:15 PM PST by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

A lot of the troops didn't like Rummy...including my son who came back from Iraq last week.


259 posted on 11/08/2006 5:04:44 PM PST by cookcounty (John Kerry: On both sides of 3 wars. Four if you count the Battle for his Mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asceticon

-Reading the tea leaves, Bush seems to have lost faith in the neocons and Jim Baker's crew of realist conservatives is taking over.-

This means if the $#!t starts to hit the fan with
endless Rat House investigations on Cheney / Halliburton etc., Cheney may well step down pre-emptively sometime in the next 2 years.


260 posted on 11/08/2006 5:10:48 PM PST by rfp1234 (I've had it up to my keyster with these leaks!!! - - - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280281-285 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson