Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Matchett-PI

Yep. All over the place the margin of victory is smaller then the Libertarian canidates share of the vote.


13 posted on 11/08/2006 8:15:02 AM PST by MNJohnnie (The Democrat Party: Hard on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie

At one time I thought I could easily align myself with the Libertarians being that I agreed in the limited government concept. That was before I realized they were rabidly pro-abortion, for legalization of all drugs, which would be the ruin of so many and although the military is one of the branched that they do feel is necessarily part of the governent they apparantly don't believe it should EVER be used. That and of course that 95% of their candidates are total nutjobs.


32 posted on 11/08/2006 8:20:34 AM PST by marlon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie
"Yep. All over the place the margin of victory is smaller then the Libertarian canidates share of the vote."

Most of them aren't small "l" libertarians like America's Founders, in reality they are relativistic, self-focused "big "L" Libertines.

They could only help the Soros-funded, anti-war, hate-America crowd win last night because of one thing -- the blood that has been shed by our brave military men who fought to preserve their freedom to stab them in the back.

As far as I'm concerned, they have blood on their hands. bttt

61 posted on 11/08/2006 8:37:50 AM PST by Matchett-PI (To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson