That a lot of name calling all rolled up into one rant. I reported your post.
It is inappropriate to call Bush a 'neocon'. He is not. Furthermore, this is a defamatory term used by libs.
It is inappropriate to call Bush 'stupid'. He clearly is not.
It is inappropriate to denigrate other Republicans as 'cronies'. Who do you expect him to appoint - Progressives? People without experience?
I completely disagree with your assessment of GWB as a "horrible communicator and a horrible leader". He has done a magnificent job through very difficult times.
You regret helping to elect Bush? Why? You would much rather have had Al. Gore or John Kerry as President? Your taxes raised rather than lowered? An immediate surrender to the islamists rather than 6 years of fighting them? Bill Clinton and friends on the U.S. Supreme Court and in all the lower courts?
I certainly don't think that the GOP 'sat on its laurels' for this election. I saw a lot of hard working people putting in a lot of extremely good effort. One of the stars of the campaign was George Bush. He was out there every day pushing our position. He did a great job of explaining it too.
Here's a guy that properly expresses just SOME of my sentiments. You're out of step with reality.
Like many Americans, Im really angry. It was bad enough to watch Republicans fall like dominoes this week. Hearing liberal Democrats claim that the election was all about the war when they didnt offer a single alternative plan was infuriating.
But receiving the knock-out punch of Donald Rumsfeld being fired the day after the Democratic Party windfall election is making a lot of us about as mad as weve been in a long, long time.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld listens to a question Friday, Sept. 29, 2006, in Portoroz, Slovenia. President Bush says Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld is stepping down and former CIA Director Robert Gates will take over at the Pentagon and in prosecuting the war in Iraq. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari) Im doing my best to try and understand what message my president is trying to send us. Last week, he told reporters that the Defense Secretary would be in place until the very final day of the presidents term. Turns out, that wasnt true at all we now know that President Bush and Secretary Rumsfeld made the decision a few weeks ago. Yesterday, the president admitted to lying to the reporters with a mischievous grin. While Im not going to shed any tears for some Associated Press reporter being given wrong information, I wonder why a simple no comment wouldnt have been a better answer last week. At least we would have been spared watching this honorable man try and explain why he didnt tell the truth.
And I suppose people can understand how reluctant the president was to appear to make Rumselds dismissal look like a political move. But isnt firing him the day after the mid-term election just as political? Lets face it; President Bush is giving Democrats just what they demanded: Don Rumsfelds head on a platter.
Its disgusting.
I guess I just dont understand politics. I try too hard to establish right from wrong. I want to hold true to my values and principles. I dont understand why President Bush or Karl Rove would give a rats rear end about what Democrats would think about the decision to go in another direction with the Secretary of Defense.
And heres the reason for my anger: If the decision to remove Rumsfeld came a few weeks ago, I wonder how many Republicans would have been able to hold on to their jobs if he had left then?
Every single poll suggested that the GOP would lose the House and maybe the Senate. They were right. As this campaign season was nearing the election, our president decided it was time for another Defense Secretary. Fine. So how about throwing a lifeline to George Allen or Rick Santorum? If this election was, indeed, about Americas dissatisfaction with the direction of the war, dont you think that a number of these razor-thin victories by Democrats might have gone the other way if Rumsfeld had stepped down a few weeks ago?
Of course they would have. It couldnt have hurt. Instead, were now left with a bunch of good Republicans like J.D. Hayworth being voted out of office and Rumsfeld being sent packing the day after the mid-term anyway.
I support and admire George W. Bush. I support this war and frankly, dont think the mid-term was about dissatisfaction with this effort. Conservatives feel abandoned over issues like illegal immigration and out-of-control spending.
And I feel abandoned by my party when I see a defense secretary thrown out to the curb the day after the Democrats thumping.
We all worked too hard during this campaign season to see this happen and not feel angry. The stakes are high, the downside too great.
Now well be treated to a couple of years of gloating Democrats who will raise our taxes, give amnesty to illegals, and, God forbid, wave the white flag of surrender in Iraq.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld listens to a question Friday, Sept. 29, 2006, in Portoroz, Slovenia. President Bush says Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld is stepping down and former CIA Director Robert Gates will take over at the Pentagon and in prosecuting the war in Iraq. (AP Photo/Haraz N. Ghanbari) I know that many of my colleagues are putting up a brave front. Theyre spinning this by suggesting that this will all energize the base. Trust me; what theyre saying privately is not quite what theyre saying publicly.
And I, for one, wont play that game.
We blew it. And Im furious.
I know Im not alone.
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/column.aspx?UrlTitle=a_double_thumping&ns=MikeGallagher&dt=11/10/2006&page=1
No, Mike Gallagher, you're not alone. Anyone with ANY sense can see this.
If you can't see the obvious, there is NO POINT in continuing this exchange. Rejoice in the victory of the Demoncrats. Spin it any way you like - whatever makes you FEEEWWWLLLL good!