Posted on 11/07/2006 11:18:51 PM PST by West Coast Conservative
President Bush struck a businesslike tone Tuesday night as the Republicans lost control of the House, making plans to call the woman poised to become speaker of a Democratic House majority.
Bush, unaccustomed to political defeat, planned a morning phone call to Democratic minority leader Nancy Pelosi and made plans to give his take on the midterm election results at an afternoon news conference.
Asked if the president was surprised that the House was headed for Democratic control, Snow said it wasnt "a slap-on-the-forehead kind of shock."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsone.ca ...
Ditto.
Someone last night (don't remember who) said that when you lack a solid message and agenda, the organizational machinery isn't enough. Maybe the turn-out effort resulted in minimizing losses...it could have been worse...but clearly we don't win with a superior ground-game alone. We still haven't figured out a way to speak around or over the heads of the media. Instead, Bush has largely allowed himself to be pounded for 6 years, and chosen to let a lot of accusations go unanswered. It discourages the base when they don't even try to answer the critics.
But what do I know? I thought Hillary might solve the health care mess--being a lawyer, who is in a position to know that litigation is the reason medical care has been priced out of the reach of everyone, and a woman of formidable intelligence, as the newsmedia repeated like a stuck record.
Actually, there's comfort in knowing I don't known nothin' about nothin'. Maybe the world's not is as bad shape as I think. Maybe I'm nuts. Maybe I need to get a hobby relax with the conviction that I habitually hallucinate so might as well not worry about it.
I've known for a long time that either the Left is bonkers or I am.
I think this is a canard. Why do you think we got wiped-out in Colorado, and J.D. Hayworth lost? The Republicans there took a hard-line against illegal immigration, didn't promote a comprehensive reform of immigration that included a guest worker program and a path to citizenship, and this hurt in the growing Hispanic electorate. It used to be that the way to get things done was through compromise, but the strident "Secure the Borders First" crowd doesn't compromise.
I pretty much shut up about the immigration issue as the election neared, and particularly as Congress voted for a fence, but without a comprehensive approach to this issue (i.e., following Bush's lead), this issue is a loser for conservatives. Rove told Hugh Hewitt on Monday that refusal to moderate the strident position was going to hurt on Tuesday, and it did. You folks told us that if we were tough on immigration, we'd win. Well, guess what...we were tough on immigration and we lost. Rant all you want...your position is a loser.
In other words, we've been totally ineffective in telling it like it is. I know we have the entire MSM against us, but instead of figuring out a way to work around them, we've just laid down and taken it. The one good thing to come out of yesterday is that we can get rid of our limp "leadership" and get some fighters in there.
"The MSM hates Conservatives, and they always get what they want."
Don't be so down. The MSM can be beaten, and we DID beat them in the 2004 election. We failed to beat them in this cycle. But we'll have another chance to crush them in two years, and I for one will welcome the opportunity.
The Rove legacy: Assume the base will follow you and then fail to lead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.