Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another reason to get rid of him is that there won't be someone for the Dims to grill once the investigations begin after Jan. 20.
1 posted on 11/07/2006 10:04:18 PM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: meandog

True.


2 posted on 11/07/2006 10:04:52 PM PST by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Rumsfeld should — and will — stay right where he is.


3 posted on 11/07/2006 10:05:43 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

I disagree with your assessment.


4 posted on 11/07/2006 10:05:48 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Toss Rove, Too.... he's a friggin IDIOT


5 posted on 11/07/2006 10:05:59 PM PST by fhlh (Polls are for Strippers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

No way. Have you any idea of the problems getting someone decent confirmed? Rumsfeld stays.


6 posted on 11/07/2006 10:06:02 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Victory will never be achieved while defining Conservatism downward, and forsaking it's heritage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
"possible WMDs being shipped to places such as Syria"

Just how were those extra troop supposed to stop something that happened before they would have been there?
7 posted on 11/07/2006 10:06:11 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Rumsfeld stays.


8 posted on 11/07/2006 10:06:13 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Ok, lets just start eating our own. He serves at the pleasure of the President not yours.


9 posted on 11/07/2006 10:06:18 PM PST by svcw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

How do you plan to confirm someone?


10 posted on 11/07/2006 10:06:20 PM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Nope. Time for the GOP to grow a spine and support the Prez.


12 posted on 11/07/2006 10:07:12 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Your endorsement of Shinseki is misguided at best.


14 posted on 11/07/2006 10:07:29 PM PST by Terpfen (And in the second year, Nick Saban said "Let there be a franchise quarterback...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

While he is at it, he should start hiring lawyers because, libs would try to impeach him....


15 posted on 11/07/2006 10:07:43 PM PST by The_Republican (So Dark The Con of Man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Geting rid of your inane opinion would be more helpful, IMO.


18 posted on 11/07/2006 10:08:20 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Vote REPUBLICAN on November 7th!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

He stays.


20 posted on 11/07/2006 10:08:30 PM PST by rintense (Liberals stand for nothing and are against everything- unless it benefits them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
Another reason to get rid of him is that there won't be someone for the Dims to grill once the investigations begin after Jan. 20.

Heck, why not get rid of Cheney and Rice too?

Have you considered that perhaps Rumsfeld is exactly the guy you want in front of an investigating committee? Pretty articulate fellow, if you haven't noticed.
21 posted on 11/07/2006 10:09:12 PM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

"Another reason to get rid of him is that there won't be someone for the Dims to grill once the investigations begin after Jan. 20." Nope, they'll just go after whom ever gets appointed or merely block any and all appointments, unless it is "Ashley Wilkes."


22 posted on 11/07/2006 10:09:51 PM PST by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
"Another reason to get rid of him is that there won't be someone for the Dims to grill once the investigations begin after Jan. 20."

Unless you mean killing him there is no reason the rats wouldn't call him on the carpet even if he wasn't SECDEF. The simple fact of the matter is, now that the American public has pulled the carpet from under the feet of our troops, we need a strongman like Rumsfeld more than ever.

23 posted on 11/07/2006 10:10:21 PM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

No dog in this fight but my hero Rummy will go.


24 posted on 11/07/2006 10:10:32 PM PST by ImpBill ("America ... Where are you now?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
"Another reason to get rid of him is that there won't be someone for the Dims to grill once the investigations begin after Jan. 20."

I wouldn't worry so much about that. If Rummy is gone, there will be someone else to investigate. I wouldn't be surprised if Bush's daughters are in front of a committee before Bush leaves office.

25 posted on 11/07/2006 10:10:37 PM PST by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog

Who says there's no politics in the military?


28 posted on 11/07/2006 10:10:55 PM PST by TheDon (Are you a cut and run conservative?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson