Watching these web sites, it's impossible to figure out what the heck's going on.
Looking at the numbers on CNN (and the Secretary of State's website) there've got to be at leat another 40,000-50,000 votes out there, but I don't see where they're coming from - or where the votes adding up now are coming from, either.
I wouldn't be surprised if some of these yet to be reported counties had to be recounted because of shady voter registration by ACORN.
Yellowstone County includes Billings, the largest city in Montana. None of that county has been counted:
Software flub leads to county recount
Problems delay results elsewhere in the state
By ED KEMMICK
Of The Gazette Staff
Yellowstone County elections workers were expecting to work until 5 or 6 this morning after deciding after midnight Wednesday to recount every ballot cast in the county Tuesday.
County Election Administrator Duane Winslow said the fault was his. The county was using a new software program for its three electronic vote-counting machines this year, he said, and he neglected an important function in tabulating the absentee ballots.
Absentee ballots - and there were nearly 20,000 in Yellowstone County this year - are normally counted first, after which the regular ballots from the precincts are counted.
After the absentee ballots were counted, Winslow said, he was supposed to hit a "zero out" button on the voting machines, which basically cleans the slate before the regular ballots are counted. That was the step Winslow neglected to take on two of the machines. He said he thinks he hit the button on one of the machines.
"It's unfamiliar," he said. "It's just a mistake I made."
As a result, he said, some of the absentee ballots, perhaps as many as 3,000, may have been counted again when the regular ballots were being run through the machines. He decided about 12:40 a.m. to undertake a complete recount.
"I'd just rather make absolutely sure, especially with races this close," he said.
Winslow assembled what staff was left in the courthouse just before 1 a.m. and told them about his decision to conduct a recount. He said they would probably be there until 5 or 6 this morning. He also said that while the reason for this recount is new, the delayed count is not unprecedented. He remembered at least two previous occasions when votes were still being counted at dawn.
http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2006/11/08/news/local/22-flub.txt