Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
I've seen that repeated and have yet to see or hear it -- got link???

I've heard it several places. Here's one from National Review's The Corner:

http://corner.nationalreview.com

Please, Please, Please [Kathryn Jean Lopez]

Tell me Tony Snow didn't say this. Via a reader: "FoxNews reporting from the White House: White House spokesman Tony Snow reacted to the change in House control by allowing they're disappointed, but that it presents some intriguing opportunities, such as passing comprehensive immigration reform which failed in the previous Republican House."

7,304 posted on 11/08/2006 2:00:59 AM PST by NYCVirago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7290 | View Replies ]


To: NYCVirago

You'll have to excuse me, but I'd have to see the exact quote before I'll put any credence in that.


If we've learned anything in this little saga it's that the press lies -- theirs AND ours.


7,307 posted on 11/08/2006 2:02:30 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7304 | View Replies ]

To: NYCVirago

You know that immigration stuff was a loser for the Republican Party from the getgo. Bush was actually right on that issue and so was the Senate and the House wasn't. The House paid for it.


7,312 posted on 11/08/2006 2:03:52 AM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7304 | View Replies ]

To: NYCVirago

Triangulation.

There's a good political strategy in here. After all, it took Clinton to victory in 1996 and it took Arnold and, literally, revesed the polls by, what, sixty points (from being down about 60-30 to up that way?).

It's really quite simple, now. Work out some kind of showey "deal" on Iraq and immigration. Get enough moderate Democrats to vote to make the tax cuts permanent. Accept the minimum wage increase...

And, blamo, Bush's approval numbers go back up to 60.

Of course, that means sacrificing important national priorities, but a good chunk of the Republican Party has shown that it's not willing to do so, so why shoud the President?


7,320 posted on 11/08/2006 2:05:00 AM PST by furquhart (Time for a New Crusade - Deus lo Volt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson