EVANS-NOVAK POLITICAL REPORT SPECIAL(Week of November 6, 2006)

Human Events ^ | November 6, 2006 | Robert Novak

[jveritas]

What is the difference between Battleground/Tarrance and Battleground/Lake. Notice that Battleground/Lake had it wrong and said Kerry would win.

[jveritas]

Tell us who are the 21 Republicans that are going to lose and show us why they are going to lose, in details.

[finnman69]

"There are a number of Freepers who are compiling lists.

"You just made the list buddy"

I feel like Leon. "Ooooohhhhhh"

[finnman69]

Battleground Goeas

[finnman69]

http://www.pollster.com/house.php

all there

[jveritas]

If you follow the liberal media, their biased polls, their pundits, and the opinions of some of our knee jerk conservative pundits then you will feel that things are grim. However all the mentioned above were always wrong on every prediction and analysis they have made in many elections before and in particular in the last three elections.

[samadams2000]

That poodle Graham needs to be EXTRACTED like the cancer he is.

[jveritas]

Biased media polls. From the 39 tossup and lean democrats the Democrats may get 3 or 4.

[WHBates]

I hope (make that pray) your right

[guitarist]

Tha's a mighty long list no one will read. Lemme reduce it to size: CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, AND BROTHER ALITO.

HOW'S THAT?

[Torie]

Here is the list. The judgement is based on individual CD polls, the recency of the polls, generic polls, partisan composition of the district, the strength of the candidate, and my gut. And there you have it.

[TexasNative2000]

The general MSM template on Tuesday night will be as follows;

All Republican wins; "Expected. Not a surprise. A hold."

All Democrat wins; "Signals a shift! A big movement! The beginning of the end for the GOP!"

There will be MASSIVE spin as early as possible while the MSM attempts to portray a Democrat landslide in order to affect races in the Central, Mountain, and Pacific timezones.

[Irish Eyes]

How good is Survey USA ? They have the last poll on the site (10-31) and have Mitchell-D 48% over JD Hayworth-R at 46%

[ALOHA RONNIE]

.


JOHN KERRY =


Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education Camp

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts

.

[Valin]

Democrats are set to gain 19 House seats, two Senate seats, and five governorships in tomorrow's elections.

I look forward to hearing what they say when this doesn't happen.

[MeanFreePath]

There are a number of Freepers who are compiling lists. They are heartily sick of this habit of the Chicken Little Freepers doing their best to spread Democrat Propaganda and hysteria about the coming Republican disaster every election cycle.

Some Freepers seem to think making wilding nonsensical claims and pronouncements of Doom and Gloom are a substitute for actually doing all the digging and research to actually know something about the issues. They want this bad Freeper habit to end before 2008. I agree with them.

Nice. Are you embroidering a hanky with all the names, Madame DeFarge?

Newsflash: Generally it doesn't look too good for the Republicans, regardless of whose poll you look at. While I hope there is something systematic across all the polls that underestimates likely Republican support, I'll stop way short of ridiculing those who aren't as optimistic. On Britt Hume's show, I just saw all three panel members predict a Republican loss of the house. Kristol's estimate was 32 seats. I hope he's wrong, and think he probably is. But someone on this board predicting a 25 seat loss is hardly a chicken-little...

[DB]

"There are a number of Freepers who are compiling lists."

Oh my...

Actually, it sound pretty juvenile to me. To put it kindly...

[jveritas]

media polls again... please.

[jveritas]

Since each the panelists on Brit Hume show predicted a different number of seat lost in the House, it means that they have no clue what is going on and that they are just pulling number from the air. If they have really well informed sources they all would have came up with very close numbers.

[MeanFreePath]

If one guy predicts 32 seats lost, one guy predicts 25 seats lost, and one guy predicts 19 seats lost, I think a prudent person would probably be inclined to think the likely number was somewhere in that range. A person engaged in wishful thinking, on the other hand, would say what you say. And I hope your wishful thinking is on the mark, might I add. But let's call it what it is.

If three football analysts pick the Colts to defeat the Texans by different margins of victory, do you say "Well, it must be a toss-up because these guys can get their predicted scores to line up?" I doubt that you do.