Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats, on the Offensive, Could Gain Both Houses
Washigton Post ^ | Sunday, November 5, 2006; Page A01 | Dan Balz and David S. Broder

Posted on 11/04/2006 8:50:10 PM PST by marginoferror

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last
To: JLS

And if this Saddam verdict comes in guilty, that could accelerate the momemtum for the GOP. With Kerry's botched joke, the great unemployment numbers and a Saddam verdict, we will have the wind at our back going into the election.


81 posted on 11/04/2006 9:42:47 PM PST by ClarenceThomasfan (It's like a plantation - and you know what I mean!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: LS

Check this out.


82 posted on 11/04/2006 9:43:36 PM PST by 1035rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rokke

Actually the poll history shows that there was a bump/dip in early October, post Foleygate, that drove down GOP identification.

It seems that *all* polling numbers got worse for GOP - for a while ... and he media took that to be general dissatisfaction ... but they are coming home.

Bush's RV approvals are now not much difference from August 2005, ie, pre-Katrina and a lot more.
Support for war in Iraq, similarly, has steadied out, as has the 'who is better, DEM or GOP, to lead?' ...

DeWine was done double digits in polls a few weeks back and is now a lot closer... every other poll is "close" in the Senate races the dems want to pick up.



83 posted on 11/04/2006 9:43:51 PM PST by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: indianrightwinger

Good point, I saw that too (no DEM advantage on Iraq) and noticed that it is not much different from in previous years, but that in early october the GOP support cratered.

So we are returning to more 'normal' polling data ... it indicates no great sea change in opinion of people versus 2004 or earlier.

Generic
2006 results better than in 1998 (which werent great, but we held the House and Senate) ...
"11/1/98 RV 51 43 "


84 posted on 11/04/2006 9:49:07 PM PST by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: marginoferror
Bush's approval rating stands at 40 percent among all Americans and 43 percent among registered voters...they keep making this same idiotic statement - half those who disapprove are conservatives who don't like Bush's overspending and waffling on illegal immigration - when they go to the polls, they are sure not going to vote for 'rats who will make the problem worse......
85 posted on 11/04/2006 9:52:30 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Writers v. Pollsters.


86 posted on 11/04/2006 9:52:35 PM PST by REDWOOD99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: marginoferror

I don't think they have much of a shot in the Senate. The House is what it comes down to and to be honest at this point I think it is too close to predict. We are in an absolute dogfight to keep Pelosi out in the House. Its all down to GOTV at this point. I know a lot of us are working our tails off in this last few days. A better groundgame won us the 2000 and 2004 elections. Lets hope it carries us again.


87 posted on 11/04/2006 10:10:15 PM PST by SmoothTalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
...Democrats have led in that "generic ballot" poll in every survey taken in recent memory.

Funny how that works. Media gives over 75 percent favorable coverage to the democrats. Journalists vote over 80 percent for the democrats. Polls show democrats leading in important election...Goebbels would be impressed.

88 posted on 11/04/2006 10:16:15 PM PST by aligncare (Beware the Media-Industrial Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: marginoferror

"The survey gives the Democrats a six-percentage-point lead nationally.." Surveys/polls can be skewed depending upon who/what/where/when/how they were conducted. A poll conducted by any in the biased, news media is most likely skewed.


89 posted on 11/04/2006 10:19:38 PM PST by Goldie Lurks (professional moonbat catcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
My predictions:

R's keep both Houses, Jon Carry to be flogged by the DBM. Stories leak out that it was the gays that sat out this election as the Demos threw them under the bus during the Foley shindig.

(If I'm wrong I will say nice things about Walmart for ten days straight!)
90 posted on 11/04/2006 10:24:46 PM PST by investigateworld (Abortion stops a beating heart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Goldie Lurks

Just got finished saying that myself. I'm beginning to sense a...theme here.


91 posted on 11/04/2006 10:27:24 PM PST by aligncare (Beware the Media-Industrial Complex!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: REDWOOD99

3) "San Francisco Values" is working."

Don't be a Nancy Boy, Vote Republican!


92 posted on 11/04/2006 10:28:08 PM PST by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: investigateworld
ROTFLOL

Great post and I won't force you to say nice things about Wal-Mart...a store I have never been in and know almost nothing about. :-)

93 posted on 11/04/2006 11:08:05 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"1. Do you disapprove/approve of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president? Do you disapprove/approve strongly or somewhat?

"Feel" the difference? It's slight, but the first question was negative in nature. The second was positive in nature."


Very true. There most certainly is a difference. My guess is that the" somewhats" are the big shifts you'll see if you reversed the wording.
94 posted on 11/05/2006 12:31:49 AM PST by CheyennePress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
"Actually the poll history shows that there was a bump/dip in early October, post Foleygate, that drove down GOP identification."

I'm not buying that. I honestly don't believe any significant number of Republicans would temporarily change their party identification based on Foleygate or any other gate. It just didn't impact the average American that much (if at all).

95 posted on 11/05/2006 2:45:31 AM PST by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: WOSG

Vote Republican..retire Charlie Rangel


96 posted on 11/05/2006 4:44:56 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson