Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Friday night, while Andrew Wilkow was subbing for Mark Levin, a caller from Missouri said that Missouri voters should vote against Amendment 2, because it IS pro-cloning, even though it doesn't say so on the ballet.

Everyone from Missouri, tell your friends, and/or call a talk show.

1 posted on 11/03/2006 9:21:35 PM PST by Sun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sun
Don't turn Missouri into the Clone Me State.
2 posted on 11/03/2006 9:25:27 PM PST by msnimje (You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun; Just another Joe


3 posted on 11/03/2006 9:29:46 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun

The stem-cell measure in California was similarly deceptive. The promotion of it was that "it doesn't allow cloning," but what the measure actually stated was that it didn't allow cloning "for reproductive purposes"; in other words, you can clone a human, as long as you kill it before it is considered a "person."


6 posted on 11/03/2006 9:42:08 PM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun

I live in St. Louis, and today I was approached on the street by a couple of pharmacy students who handed me what they SAID was a copy of the actual amendment and told me to "read it before you go to the polls and vote on it."

So I get halfway down the first page, and I see:

(1) No person may clone or attempt to cone a human being;
(2) No human blastocyst may be produced by fertilization solely for the purpose of stem cell research;
(4) No person may ... purchase or sell human blastocysts or eggs for stem cell research or stem cell therapie and cures

The whole thing goes on like that. They've sunk to a new low... handing out FRAUDULENT copies of the bill. And the university PAYS for the copies, I'm sure — how convenient.


9 posted on 11/04/2006 1:25:28 AM PST by landeraepi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun
Missouri voters should vote against Amendment 2, because it IS
pro-cloning, even though it doesn't say so on the ballet.


If I hadn't accidentally seen a show on EWTN on the Missouri
Amendment 2, I wouldn't have realized what a mendacious piece of work
the "pro" campaign is.
That show had the best, most complete discussion I've seen in the media
(and I'm not a Catholic)
13 posted on 11/04/2006 10:50:19 AM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun
Amendment 2 is "2 tricky." And the human-cloning "bait and switch" is just the beginning.

Just think of all the mindless clones the Dem's could muster to vote for them.

34 posted on 11/04/2006 12:20:10 PM PST by EGPWS (Lord help me be the conservative liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun
Yes, it was written to be tricky....so much so that it even fooled our esteemed ex-Senator Danforth and his doctor father. I am sooo disappointed. It looks like it's on track to pass. On the upside, it should also bring out the conservative voters which can only help Talent.
36 posted on 11/04/2006 12:27:31 PM PST by ShowMeMom (America: The home of the FREE because of the BRAVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun

bump


37 posted on 11/04/2006 12:28:36 PM PST by ShowMeMom (America: The home of the FREE because of the BRAVE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson