Posted on 11/03/2006 8:24:52 PM PST by freedom44
There, I fixed it for him.
In the 1990's, the state grew by 3 million, but its white population dropped by almost half a million. L.A. County alone lost 480,000 white folks.
Interesting. The white population of the ENTIRE STATE dropped by "almost" half a million and LA county alone lost almost half a million.
Sounds like ONLY LA county is losing whites.
What is surprising is the action of Republican partisans and some conservatives on this forum. I can see no reasonable, or prudent, or logical, or philosophical reason to support a liberal for governor. None.
When Schwarzenegger works to undermine both the platform and the candidates of the party in which he is registered, he should be separated from the Republican Party.
Even an 8th grade, civics student knows where the Austrian will take the state in the next four years; higher taxes, bigger government; more government spending and fewer personal freedoms. To achieve his goals, Schwarzenegger will overcome the direct opposition of Republican legislators by excluding them from the legislative process.
That Schwarzenegger can be called a Republican by partisan loyalists, is simply dumbfounding.
I notice Arnie's Army of Apologists haven't been out to play lately.
Yes, I thought about that too as I was transmitting the quote. My guess is that LA County is so large geographically and so densely populated (and has the greater majority of illegals) that the statistics there natuarally reflect this disproportionality.
Mark my words, you wacko McClintock voters, come 2006 California will be the national leader in entrepreneurship!You just wait and see!!!! You guys will be eating crow!!!!
-- FR Arnoldbots, c. 2003
ROFL! You got most of it in there.
One of my favorites was the contention that, with Arnold, you get the same fiscal conservatism as you would with McClintock.
Yah... right!
By golly! You been payin attenshun!!! (snart!)
I'm so glad to have a governor who thinks we're so stupid that we can't remember the endless "infrastructure" bonds or gas taxes for roads or the buttloads of money for the schools IN WHICH THE MONEY NEVER QUITE SEEMED TO MAKE IT TO THE "REBUILDING" IT WAS INTENDED FOR.
Yes, he was wrong. He never should have recommended "yes" on the levee bond.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.