Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS

Great analysis and commentary.

FYI, I have read NRO commentary claiming sources are talking good internals, not bad.


62 posted on 11/03/2006 7:23:18 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: finnman69
My point on "internals" is, if it's from polling, they wouldn't know if they are "good" or "bad." The numbers are simply against them. Again, the math is astounding: for a decent sample, you need 7,000 calls minimum in ONE NIGHT. I seriously doubt ANY polling firm is doing that for most House districts.

BTW, jmaroneps37, who is in the business, said that their research on Rob Simmons in CT showed that the larger the sample, the better the R did consistently. Most of these House samples are 500 peeps.

87 posted on 11/04/2006 5:54:15 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson