So, in other words, someone at the IAEA blabbed to the NYT. Between the two of them they came up with the phony excuse that nuclear bomb building instructions were posted at the government site because it was obvious you were finding evidence the IAEA and the NYT didn't want you to find. It was a way to stop you and anyone else from translating the documents. The truth is not on the agenda of the NYT or the IAEA.
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/11/02/november-surprise-nyt-plans-page-one-iraq-wmd-splash-for-tomorrow/
"Oooh, nice little tidbit:
“Some intelligence officials feared that individual documents, translated and interpreted by amateurs, would be used out of context to second-guess the intelligence agencies’ view that Mr. Hussein did not have unconventional weapons or substantive ties to Al Qaeda.”
But I thought the whole point of putting them up was to uncover that link? Since when was it the agencies view that Saddam didn’t have WMD’s or ties to Al Qaeda? The day after we attacked?
p0s3r on November 2, 2006 at 10:52 PM"
I think this is the story in a nutshell. They wanted to shut you and others up, Joe.