Video at link (amazing!)
From the Land of Hopeless Idealists
1 posted on
11/03/2006 10:59:51 AM PST by
llevrok
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: llevrok
Those of us Seattlites who objected to this expensive social experiment objected on both these grounds (the absurd price and that they would be used for drugs and prostitution).
The arrogant Leftist Sea$$holes told us we were wrong, we didn't know what we were talking about, and jammed it through.
Just like the Monorail.
Damn glad I'm out of that Leftist hellhole. Incidentally, when they pushed this, they stated one reason for pursuing it: to give the homeless a place to relieve themselves so they wouldn't do so on public sidewalks (because of course there was no other possible way to prevent this). Tourists and residents had nothing to do with it. Based on this article, people are still relieving themselves on the sidewalks.
25 posted on
11/03/2006 11:34:23 AM PST by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: llevrok
One solution: daily hydrant flushing ... maybe hourly ... autmoatically if there is 'suspicious behavior'
26 posted on
11/03/2006 11:42:21 AM PST by
yevgenie
(Q. What is the first sign of AIDS? A. A pounding sensation in the ass.)
To: llevrok
Count me among "the glad NOT to be a crack smoke expert".
27 posted on
11/03/2006 11:51:44 AM PST by
kublia khan
(Absolute war brings total victory)
To: llevrok
Every city council member ought to be forced to go potty in one of these things on a daily basis.
28 posted on
11/03/2006 11:55:10 AM PST by
D-Chivas
To: llevrok
Washingtonians east of the Cascades want to shove the northwestern tip of Washington state into Canada.
To: llevrok
Seattle Refugee checking in, living the clean life in Fargo, ND. Y'all can just suck eggs and die out there (Freepers excluded, of course.)
32 posted on
11/03/2006 12:20:44 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
("We will slaughter anyone who calls Islam violent!")
To: llevrok
An actual toilet in Seattle.
33 posted on
11/03/2006 12:33:13 PM PST by
razorback-bert
(I met Bill Clinton once but he didn’t really talk — he was hitting on my wife)
To: llevrok
>>>
From the Land of Hopeless Idealists <<< Tell me about it. I live there!!
You could get a pretty hefty number of Porta-Potties serviced for $6,500,000.
And now more money after bad for security cameras and better lighting. What - so the folks at City Hall will have some funny movies to watch on their coffee breaks?
Our Mayor: ""As long as we have them, we've got to try and keep them safe" said Mayor Greg Nickels. "
Hell, mayor. Instead of building little-bitty crack houses all over the city, why not build one big one and send in the drug police. ooh, I'm sorry. That would be defined as discrimination and profiling.
Nothing wrong with Seattle that couldn't be cured by about 300,000 conservatives migrating here.
36 posted on
11/03/2006 1:00:12 PM PST by
HardStarboard
(Hey illegals, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
To: llevrok
And people gathering inside the toilet, so many sometimes, it's hard for the doors to close.
It should be obvious that there are several problems here.
1. the toilets are too small and need to be remodeled to accommodate more people to keep the lines outside smaller
2. The toilets are encouraging the drug trade and should be relocted to safer areas in the city.
I suggest perhaps across the street from residences of the clowns who voted for them.
To: llevrok; Maynerd; Bobsvainbabblings; moneypenny; Kaylee Frye; Clintonfatigued; wallcrawlr; ...
38 posted on
11/05/2006 2:04:14 AM PST by
BADROTOFINGER
(Life sucks. Get a helmet.)
To: llevrok
What a stupid story. The problem is the liberal policies toward prostitutes and drug users and the story is essentially blaming the problem on toilets.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson