To: Man50D
...and a vote for Lamont is a vote
for national security?
I'm trying to understand, here?
74 posted on
11/03/2006 5:04:48 AM PST by
aligncare
(Liberals? Mutants? You decide.!)
To: aligncare
...and a vote for Lamont is a vote for national security?
I'm trying to understand, here?
You misunderstand. Voting for Lieberman would be as much a disaster as voting for Lamont. Both are Democrats and want the Democrats to take control of Congress which we all know would destroy our national security and the country. For some inexplicable reason the RINO's in Connecticut prefer to vote for Lieberman despite the above fact and the fact he voted against the Secure Fence Act, instead of voting for their own candidate who is as strong if not stronger on national security than socialist Joe!
82 posted on
11/03/2006 5:19:19 AM PST by
Man50D
(Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson