Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bnelson44

"So they just had the retained knowledge and could start it up as soon as they wanted to? Like, say, in a year? "

That may not be others' opinion, but it's mine. They found thousands of pages stashed in a Baghdad rose garden that one of the scientists hid from inspectors for 12 years ... people yawn at it "oh, 12 years old". excuse me, but nuclear weapons technology started in the 1940s. If Saddam was within 1 year in 1991, he could have MADE HIMSELF GET WITHIN ONE YEAR AGAIN VERY QUICKLY.

If he was given a free reign in 2003, he'd be making the same noises Iran is making by now. he'd still need centrifuges, but maybe he'd get some from RPNK!

This is another reminder of the real seriousness of the WMD threat that Saddam posed.


139 posted on 11/02/2006 8:53:46 PM PST by WOSG (Broken-glass time, Republicans! Save the Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
he'd still need centrifuges, but maybe he'd get some from RPNK!

Or just buy the enriched uranium.

151 posted on 11/02/2006 8:58:53 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: WOSG

You are right about the threat he posed. Iraq may have had the KNOWLEDGE to build a bomb for a long time. It was the ability to process the material causing the delay.


157 posted on 11/02/2006 9:00:39 PM PST by gb63
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson