Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bnelson44

When was "at the time"? The 1990s or 2002?


72 posted on 11/02/2006 8:46:59 PM PST by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Yardstick

"When was "at the time"? The 1990s or 2002?"

...or the year before the Persian Gulf War?


74 posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:34 PM PST by steadcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

To: Yardstick

Is this sentence referring to 1990, before the Persian Gulf War? Or 2002, months before the invasion of Iraq? Because "Iraq is a year away from building a nuclear bomb" was supposed to be a myth, a lie that Bush used to trick us into war.

And yet here is the New York Times, saying that Iraq had a "how to manual" on how to build a nuclear bomb, and could have had a nuke in a year.

So it doesn't matter when the plans were known. In 2002 the docs were written. They reflect what Saddam's gov''t knew then.

The antiwar crowd is going to have to argue that the information somehow wasn't dangerous in the hands of Saddam Hussein, but was dangerous posted on the Internet. It doesn't work. It can't be both no threat to America and yet also somehow a threat to America once it's in the hands of Iran. Game, set, and match.

Ref:
http://tks.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ZTJjYzYzYmMwNjY3N2YwNWE5NDQ3ZTQzZDczZWU5N2Y=


76 posted on 11/02/2006 8:50:52 PM PST by bnelson44 (Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson