The NYT now thinks Iraqi Nuclear Research was a Threat??? Hmmm
If publishing these documents is a real threat, then you have to conclude that the Iraqi nuclear research was a real threat. Somehow I dont think that fits the NYT template.
The NYT now has a problem with publishing sensitive materials??? O K
I seem to recall the NYT had no problem publishing information that would expose US efforts at surveillance and tracking of terrorist phone and financial transactions.
The NYT had no interest in translating captured Iraqi documents because they were concerned about revealing weapons secrets??? Right
Is this why none of the major print, cable, and television news agencies cared to translate the captured Iraqi documents?
The NYT really believes that Democrats are strong on national security and the real threat to security is Republicans exposing the content of captured Iraqi documents???
Might your concern have anything to do with the fact that the Democrats are in desperate need of a boost on the national security issue, and the Republicans need to be taken down a notch 3 days before an election???
This article is wrong on so many levels
"The NYT had no interest in translating captured Iraqi documents because they were concerned about revealing weapons secrets??? Right
"
After reading this, I have to wonder. You are correct that the DBM has done nothing to translate any documents, but suddenly they found one to bash the President with. Did someone tell them exactly where to look and what to look for?