Replies

One Texas man trucked his to Louisiana and sold it. A few other tenants have hooked them up to vehicles and even taken their trailers to deer leases to have a place to stay while hunting.

Thus proving they could make much better use of their trailers than FEMA did with most of its trailer inventory. Why is it a problem for taxpayers (which these individuals sound like, as opposed to perpetually drunk/high/unemployed elfare addicts) to tow a trailer to a deer lease and LIVE in it (you know, the intended use), or sell it for cash which was likely used towards paying for alternative living quarters or home repairs, while FEMA simply destroyed many thousands of trailers without even briefly putting them to anythong remotely resembling their intended use?

Why is it a problem for taxpayers (which these individuals sound like, as opposed to perpetually drunk/high/unemployed elfare addicts) to tow a trailer to a deer lease and LIVE in it (you know, the intended use), or sell it for cash which was likely used towards paying for alternative living quarters or home repairs

You make a lot of allowances for people who trash, misuse, or even sell property paid for by the taxpayers (us)? Surely, if someone illegally sold government property, it must be so they can fix up their house. And since the government mishandled some of these trailers, these people getting the free trailers to live in shouldn't be bound by things such as a contract.

I didn't see your excuse for them trashing the trailers and using them as drug labs, but I'm sure it's someone else's fault. You give these people a lot of credit, even giving them the benefit of the doubt that they are taxpayers. I know what state you live in, the state of denial!