As he has the authority to do.
Since Ann and her attorney are disgusted by the leaks to the press that apparently came from this scumbag Anderson and/or his election board, they effectively told him to go play in the street.
So what is Ann hiding?
I don't know but I'd like to peek.
Anderson has the right to leak information to the press?
Your bias here is stunning.
Ann's lawyer wants a face-to-face meeting to establish accountability of the information. Anderson wants a letter so he has plausible deniability - especially given the already established pattern of leaking info to the press.
What makes you think she's hiding anything?
While the DA has the right to have all communication occur in writing, Ann (and anyone else, for that matter) has the right not to give this guy the time of day.
Put yourself in that situation. You're alleged to have committed some infraction on someone else's (?) say-so. After an initial contact with the DA's office, you see that most everything you've given the DA has been leaked to the press.
How are you going to counter that? What recourse is given you? After this guy has publicly dragged you through the mud, what do you owe this guy?
NOTHING!!!!
And so it is with Ann. She owes him nothing. She owes you nothing. And if the charges are deemed to be fully prosecutable with a fair to middling chance of success, she is entitled to her day in court.
And for what it's worth, Ann is a Constitutional lawyer of some notoriety. I'll put her credentials up against yours any day, sight unseen.
CA....
Prolly not HIDING a thing, just Ann's a hothead. Cute, but when she gets mad she goes off like cats at a busted airhose. It wouldn't surprize me a bit to read her remark, relayed by her attorney as "K.M.A."