Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
BeHoldAPaleHorse said: "... and the exculpatory and/or mitigating information is not entered as evidence. "

If the information has any likelihood whatever of preventing a prosecution, what would make it inadmissable? I think it would be a mistake to expect that the prosecutor would do Ann any favors.

Acquittal have been rendered in minutes for cases that prosecutors spent months on. That is because the prosecutor WANTS the defendant to be guilty.

Ask Martha Stewart if silence would have been better.

125 posted on 11/02/2006 5:34:55 PM PST by William Tell (RKBA for California (rkba.members.sonic.net) - Volunteer by contacting Dave at rkba@sonic.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: William Tell
If the information has any likelihood whatever of preventing a prosecution, what would make it inadmissable?

The defendant not entering it comes to mind.

Ask Martha Stewart if silence would have been better.

Telling the truth would've been even better than silence. And the same would obtain for Ann Coulter--unless the truth demonstrates that she's committed a felony, of course.

127 posted on 11/02/2006 8:51:24 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson