[RasterMaster]

They have to cover Saddam's sentencing tomorrow. If he's sentenced to DEATH, any further trials are moot. DUmocrats wanted the election to be about Iraq, and so it is.

1. Jean-Fraud Kerry infers that soldiers in Iraq are dumb.

2. Soldiers respond

3. NYT admits Saddam had nuke program.

4. Families of fallen visit Iraq (no quagmire)

5. Saddam sentenced (death by wood chipper)

News cycle seems to be working for GOP advantage thus far.

[Impeach98]

Great summary!

_________________________

They have to cover Saddam's sentencing tomorrow. If he's sentenced to DEATH, any further trials are moot. DUmocrats wanted the election to be about Iraq, and so it is.

1. Jean-Fraud Kerry infers that soldiers in Iraq are dumb.

2. Soldiers respond

3. NYT admits Saddam had nuke program.

4. Families of fallen visit Iraq (no quagmire)

5. Saddam sentenced (death by wood chipper)

News cycle seems to be working for GOP advantage thus far.

[RasterMaster]

DUmocrats counter with "Rusmsfeld must resign" and "recruiters caugh lying" stories.

Wow. That's new....NOT! I don't know what Monday brings, but I've got a good idea about the day after.

[TexasPatriot8]

Yes it does. All the things you listed. None of those are good for the DEmocrats, and you can tell that because none of those things hit the evening news last night. All they talked about was the Preacher, and how good the Democrats are doing in the election. They didn't even mention the two Democrat Congressmen in Georgia that have basically already lost their seats to the Republican challengers. That's a two seat advantage for the Republicans forcing the Democrats to have to take two more GOP seats to get a House Majority and they were already pushing it in trying to take the ones they needed before that. And if the voting is so heavy Democrat, how could Republican voters take away two long time Democrat House seats? That sure doesn't fit the media bubble that all things are Democrat this year.