DOD Directive 5220.6 - Defective Security Document

The contract employee at the center of a possible security breach at Los Alamos National Laboratory had a high-level clearance that may have given her special access to intelligence intercepts and other closely held national secrets, sources familiar with the case said yesterday.

The FBI is examining at least three computer disks that police in Los Alamos, N.M., discovered last week during a search of a suspected drug dealer's trailer home, according to the FBI and other agencies. A woman who was living at the home and worked for a Los Alamos subcontractor has been linked to the disks by investigators, officials said.

Authorities said the disks appear to contain classified material. An FBI search warrant filed in connection with the case has been sealed.

The investigation -- which was revealed publicly on Tuesday -- is the latest potential embarrassment for the Los Alamos lab, which is under new management and undergoing changes designed to improve security. The lab is one of the nation's three nuclear-weapons-research facilities.

Los Alamos Director Michael Anastasio confirmed the potential breach of security in a statement yesterday. He said that the lab is cooperating with the FBI and is implementing extra security measures.

It is easy to see how the contractor got into Los Alamos if you spent a lifetime in secure military engineering. They simply located a strategic position, and put in a hand-picked sub-contractor to retrieve the docs. Her job was to retrieve the documents for somebody. You cannot just waltz in and get secure documents. She had to have "secure access" which was probably provided. She was probably just the person they used to move the docs.

NSA sub-contractors use DOD 5220.6 as a convenient way to get rid of secure loyal personnel and replace them. Since 1992, NSA has been firing loyal personnel using Hearsay Evidence that would not be admissible in any Federal Court. They just dredge up anything and say that DOD Directive 5220.6 permits it.

Sometimes it's for the placement fee, sometimes it's to retrieve secure docs for somebody. Security procedures at secure installations are at risk as long as NSA and DOD use sub-contractors to do security clearance reviews.

NSA contracts out their labor to hack inexperienced investigators and foreign agents. Of course, they never catch the foreign agents until it's too late, like Los Alamos.

Directive 5220.6 was written by a guy named Atwood who was an under-secretary of Defense in 1992. He was not empowered to draft any directives, but he managed to tack on a 35 page addendum to a Presidential Order of Eisenhower, to make his directive look like it was a legitimate order of Eisenhower. DOD and NSA have been using it as a weapon against loyal personnel ever since. Under this Directive, they can pull up any shred of inadmissible evidence and hold the individual accountable. They hold clandestine administrative hearings and they "relax" the Federal Evidence Code, a provision written specifically by Atwood toward the end of the directive. Eisenhower would never relax the Federal Evidence Code. When you relax the Federal Code, you can conduct a military-esque tribunal with anything as evidence whether it's illegally obtained, or Hearsay.

The NSA sub-contractor agent has a list of secure installations and positions, especially lucrative engineering positions. They can easily locate those engineering jobs that are key to security, and maneuver the personnel, either for profit, kickbacks, or to sell to foreign intelligence. Time to retire 5220.6.

The national archives on this are massive, but after looking for conspirators over a lifetime, they all leave tracks. (It's what I do in my spare time for fun) Just like the IRS can spot entries on spreadsheets where the books were cooked, anybody who is knowledgeable about Constitutional Theory and Law, can spot tracks where somebody tried to override Constitutional theory and law, with their own homemade policy brew.

These guys come up with these global agendas and in order to put them in play, they have to hide the agenda inside the small print hoping nobody will find it. As long as no teams of special prosecutors go around reading what they wrote, they're home free.

I go read the Congressional Record Index when I'm bored, just to see what they've been up to lately. I already knew about the agenda to override the Constitution using Credit Reporting agencies to compile private records on people. They turn their records over to the DOD to make enemies lists and no fly lists. It's all part of Nixon's old agenda.

Nixon signed the Credit Reporting legislation into law after Congress fought it for 3 years 1967-1970. The Republicans and DOD had to have credit reports compiled by private business because the government can't do it legally. Credit reports are key if you have to put a neo-nazi agenda into play. You gotta keep track of people day and night. (IBM and the Holocaust???)

The Credit Score, supplied by Fair Isaac is the brainchild of two guys, Bill Fair and Earl Isaac, both of whom erased their bios. They got into the DOD computer lab at Stanford in the 1950's and came up with the Bell Curve system of economics. They also used a handy little book called "How to Lie with Statistics", to dupe Congress with statistical hobbledeegob so Congress would put the rubber stamp of legitimacy on credit reports.

Researching Federal Court cases is straightforward. We already know the agenda is hidden inside the small print, so we look for Directive numbers and Presidential Order numbers, then cross reference the language. If President Eisenhower made an Order, we read it to see exactly what he ordered.

Eisenhower ordered a simplistic security procedure check and ordered DOD to adhere to the Constitution because some contractor in 1959 lost his security clearance without due process. The Supreme Court ordered that in order for the DOD to yank a security clearance, they had to use Due Process of Law, which meant implement the Federal Rules.

Nixon amended Eisehower's orders with his own version, reversing the need for due process, which was the exact reverse of the Supreme Court order. Bush and Cheney changed Nixon's Order by letting under secretary Atwood tag on 30 pages of his own personal rants and raves about patriotism and you're not a patriot if you don't march in line and go to some mega-church, and run a flag up your front porch at dawn.

Atwood's directive contains every possible human circumstance so the DOD can conduct a witch hunt and target whomever they want. Every American has a credit report, every American has relatives that travel to foreign countries, every American has all the traits listed as "suspect" as outlined in Atwood's Directive.

We are all suspect and we have to prove ourselves and our "patriotism". Everybody is over at the airport taking off their shoes and opening their purses because Atwood put the groundwork in play in 1992. The Patriot Act itself was part of the work from the New World Order directives at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions at U.C. Santa Barbara from 1957 to 1971. It all ends in 1971 when Watergate erupts.

The Doctrine of Natural Law which is embodied in the Constitution does not entertain credit reports, or no-fly lists, or hearsay, or concepts such as "patriotism". Everybody is equal, and there's an assumption that everybody is starting at the same point. Under Atwood's Directive, everybody is 'suspect" committing "suspicious activities"....

meanwhile, the President and the employees at DOD form foreign alliances of an unknown nature and plot and make agendas, many of which are intended to overthrow the Constitution. Nazi Germany in a nutshell. I personally would love to see a disclosure subpoena on Skull and Bones. All it would take is a Federal brief and make Skull and Bones dredge up all their docs. The allegation is simple: The President belongs to a secret society. Under Directive 5220.6 you are "suspect" if you belong to a secret society. 5220.6 accuses defense contractors of being disloyal if they belong to secret societies. Therefore: It's unequal enforcement of the law under the 14th Amendment. You can't have one law for the nation and a different law for the President. Goodby Skull and Bones. Everybody already knows all they do is plot agendas.

The Southern Poverty Law Center can't keep up with all the nazi agendas in the nation that are armed, currently holed up in places like Kalispell Montana waiting for the "go" signal to wipe all the progressives off the face of the earth. And the DOD isn't exactly stomping around the militia campgrounds looking for terrorists. They're going around to defense contractors pulling the people who represent a threat to the agenda accusing them of being 'suspect.

I suggest that the DOD log onto the Southern Poverty Law Center website and get a membership list of the over 600 hate groups operating within the U.S. who would and did form allegiances with Middle Eastern terrorists in order to implement a plan and stop mucking around in some kind of sham show of defense.

You can weigh evidence and implement emergency orders and profile threats to national security under the Constitution. They did it in the past. There's a precedent established. The Constitution is a common sense document. The ACLU could do it, they just don't. Neither do all these great Constitutional scholars.

Even tho they thought they thought they ended the enemies list, they missed it. The enemies list took the form of an internal document at DOD where they regularly denied security clearances to whomever they pleased in order to replace them with cronies. It's been a Republican agenda all the time, passed down.

When Bush got it, he tossed it to Cheney, who tossed it to Atwood, and they set the groundwork for the Patriot Act by establishing clandestine hearings where the Federal Evidence Code is "relaxed" and where Administrative "judges" make their own determinations....and Eisenhower gets the blame. They have been amending and re-amending since 1959, trying to put cronies inside the defense industry. No attorney wants to file any special writs, Congress doesn't hold hearings, and nobody wants to take on DOD 5220.6.

They can work the defense contractors in and out of key contracts, offering themselves the opportunity of disposing of loyal personnel and replacing them with people like they plugged into Los Alamos. She was just sent there. She couldn't find a secure document in her sleep. They gave her the docs and she moved them.

I was at Los Alamos on vacation. I love historical museums and they have a great one there. I had never been there before. It's on a high mesa, and there's nothing but retired military contractors, scientists, geeks, sitting around having a few beers. It's not where you would go to sell drugs because the profit margin is probably zero and the local cops would spot you in a minute.

And the Lab itself has a security perimeter a mile thick. The only way in is to get a contract job, conveniently arranged from the inside with the help of DOD Directive 5220.6. So, Nancy Pelosi, we got rid of Rumsfeld, time to get rid of his cronies at the DOD and dump Atwood's convenient directive.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.