Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Matchett-PI

I always appreciate confirmation that what I wrote was accurate. In this instance especially because Fred Barnes is the only one on TV I've heard say, the #2 initiative on the Missouri ballot is in trouble. Makes sense the MSM wouldn't want to admit Rush challenging Fox is reaping rewards, but failing to report how this might impact the Talent/McCaskill race is just plain dereliction of duty.


A few days ago I watched Charlie Cook be interviewed about the Michael J. Fox ad and the responding ad. Cook cooed how effective the Fox ad was, on and on he praised it. When shown the responding ad, Cook said it meant nothing to him, he didn't know who those people were, it was a bad, ineffectual ad. I don't know when I've seen Cook be so in the tank! He would have us believe he didn't know Jim Caveisal, Patricia Heaton, or the athletes, and be willing to predict because of his own ignorance, the ad wouldn't work.


4 posted on 10/31/2006 3:27:55 AM PST by YaYa123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: YaYa123

O'Reilly did a sort of expose` last night on his program about exactly "who" is behind this whole thing. I was doing other things at the time, so I'd have to rewind my videotape to get the details. Big money interests are involved and they're using "infallible victims" as front people.


5 posted on 10/31/2006 3:47:37 AM PST by Matchett-PI (To have no voice in the Party that always sides with America's enemies is a badge of honor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson